Trek/Gary Fisher Lane??? A Clyde's dream?
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek/Gary Fisher Lane??? A Clyde's dream?
I recently walked in to my LBS and spied a stealthy black road bike that didn't look like the usual skinny tire 200 pound max. rides I am used to seeing. Upon closer examination I see it is the 2011 Trek/GF Lane, which is a cyclocross bike set up for commuting. i was torn between an entry level road bike vs. a upper end FX series but now I am thinking this may be the best of all worlds. Anyone riding these yet?
#3
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just thinking out loud here. Why is the Lane roughly $1K? The 1.1 seems to have many similar components but only costs $695. The 1.2/1.5 are closer in range but have sora/tiagra stuff instead. Even the Schwinn Le Tour Classic has better specs for a few hundreds less. Is the steel that much better? I am suffering from paralysis from analysis!!?!?!!
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
The Lane looks overpriced. I've got an FX 7.3 that (this year) costs only $650 but has very similar component group to the Lane. The FX 7.3 has an aluminum frame with a steel-alloy fork and plenty of eyelets for front and rear racks, fenders, etc. Even doing a change-over to a drop bar (as I did after 1 year) would still be <$1,000.
#5
Rain, rain go away
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 351
Bikes: 2009 Schwinn Sierra GS; 2010 Specialized Allez Elite Compact; 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
But ... but ... but .... steel is real!
All kidding aside, I'd really like a steel bike. But there are probably other steel bikes out there with better components for the same price.
All kidding aside, I'd really like a steel bike. But there are probably other steel bikes out there with better components for the same price.
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Look at Masi Bicycles (masibikes.com). They've always had a few 'steelies' in their line-up, and this year they've upped it to nine models (SS and multi-geared), and any of the multi-geared models look better eqipped than Trek's Lane.
I personaly like a stiff aluminum frame with steel fork, but after test riding a Masi Randonneur a few weeks ago, I'm thinkin' it would look really nice in my 'man cave' and with me on it out on the road for a long 100+ mile weekends next spring-summer-fall. (Still keeping my 2006 Trek FX 7.3 - its a great workout/commuter bike).
I personaly like a stiff aluminum frame with steel fork, but after test riding a Masi Randonneur a few weeks ago, I'm thinkin' it would look really nice in my 'man cave' and with me on it out on the road for a long 100+ mile weekends next spring-summer-fall. (Still keeping my 2006 Trek FX 7.3 - its a great workout/commuter bike).
#7
Downtown Spanky Brown
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enola, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: Motobecane Phantom Cross Pro Kona Lana'I
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A bit over priced, but not really that outlandish. If you like how it rides then go for it! What's a few bucks here or there for the bike you really like?
#8
Rain, rain go away
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 351
Bikes: 2009 Schwinn Sierra GS; 2010 Specialized Allez Elite Compact; 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you guys find the Trek bikes are a bit overpriced overall? I'm lusting after a 7.7 FX, but that's a huge price gap between the 7.7 and the 7.6 for the gain in componentry, I think.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I recently walked in to my LBS and spied a stealthy black road bike that didn't look like the usual skinny tire 200 pound max. rides I am used to seeing. Upon closer examination I see it is the 2011 Trek/GF Lane, which is a cyclocross bike set up for commuting. i was torn between an entry level road bike vs. a upper end FX series but now I am thinking this may be the best of all worlds. Anyone riding these yet?
#10
Downtown Spanky Brown
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enola, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: Motobecane Phantom Cross Pro Kona Lana'I
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Somewhat, especially when you consider their over use of in-house brand components (Bontranger). That is not to knock Bontranger, some of their stuff is very nice and others is so-so. But when you think about it, you really are paying a premium for a Trek considering all the generic parts. Price wise, this year's model line up seems much more reasonable than they have been in the past.
#11
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the sweet spot for the FX line is somewhere between the 7.3 and the 7.5. Maybe the 7.3 disc is the best of all worlds? The 7.7 is reaaally nice but you really just have to want it to justify the price (7.9 anyone??). I agree that Masi makes some sweet steel as well but my situation dictates that it must be in the Trek family. The bigger "weight loss" picture scheme is that I have a Trek card that I picked up a year or so and it's been burning a hole in my wallet as I try to figure out what I like best. The plan was to use the 0% financing to spread the payments out over the next year. Any money I would have spent on fast food for lunch or chilled Starbucks frappachinos ($2.50 a bottle x 5 or 6 a day = yikes!!) will now be bike money. That is how I have justified the new bike purchase to my better half. I expect to weigh 201.1 pounds by the end of 2011. It may well just be the Lane because I simply like the blacked out look (ala Cdale Bad Boy..and older target of my dreams) The new 1.2 looked nice too..and the 7.5 FX...and the...ohh, I need to go lay down now.
#12
Watching and waiting.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mattoon,Ill
Posts: 2,023
Bikes: Trek 7300 Trek Madone 4.5 Surly Cross Check
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like how your diet plan finances the bike purchase.Why not wait until you've saved some money? The bikes will still be for sale.Another "finance" plan could be so many dollars a pound in weight loss buys the bike.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I think the sweet spot for the FX line is somewhere between the 7.3 and the 7.5. Maybe the 7.3 disc is the best of all worlds? The 7.7 is reaaally nice but you really just have to want it to justify the price (7.9 anyone??). I agree that Masi makes some sweet steel as well but my situation dictates that it must be in the Trek family. The bigger "weight loss" picture scheme is that I have a Trek card that I picked up a year or so and it's been burning a hole in my wallet as I try to figure out what I like best. The plan was to use the 0% financing to spread the payments out over the next year. Any money I would have spent on fast food for lunch or chilled Starbucks frappachinos ($2.50 a bottle x 5 or 6 a day = yikes!!) will now be bike money. That is how I have justified the new bike purchase to my better half. I expect to weigh 201.1 pounds by the end of 2011. It may well just be the Lane because I simply like the blacked out look (ala Cdale Bad Boy..and older target of my dreams) The new 1.2 looked nice too..and the 7.5 FX...and the...ohh, I need to go lay down now.
#14
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do appreciate the concerns about going into debt. Believe me, I have thought about that risk as well. That's why getting the bike now helps me in two ways. 1: I have the bike to use to help me lose weight 2: The sheer thought of ruining my credit is one more reason to pay the monthly bill rather than the junk food and drink...thus losing weight as well.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cut n Shoot Texas
Posts: 92
Bikes: 86' schwinn sprint updated and converted to touring, Trek 3 series, trek 1.2, and as soon as the disk LHT comes out it will be added
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do appreciate the concerns about going into debt. Believe me, I have thought about that risk as well. That's why getting the bike now helps me in two ways. 1: I have the bike to use to help me lose weight 2: The sheer thought of ruining my credit is one more reason to pay the monthly bill rather than the junk food and drink...thus losing weight as well.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I do appreciate the concerns about going into debt. Believe me, I have thought about that risk as well. That's why getting the bike now helps me in two ways. 1: I have the bike to use to help me lose weight 2: The sheer thought of ruining my credit is one more reason to pay the monthly bill rather than the junk food and drink...thus losing weight as well.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central PA
Posts: 629
Bikes: Cannondale Six5, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR & old Hard Rock
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not to be a downer, but if you think most road bikes are suited to handle only guys under 200 lbs. ,you need to broaden your research. Lots of great, sturdy bikes out there. For $1100, you should be able to find a nice 105 equipped rig.
#18
Rain, rain go away
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 351
Bikes: 2009 Schwinn Sierra GS; 2010 Specialized Allez Elite Compact; 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central PA
Posts: 629
Bikes: Cannondale Six5, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR & old Hard Rock
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yeah, got my Cannondale six with 105 / ultegra 10 speed mix for $1100 last February as a leftover.
Last edited by clydeosaur; 12-24-10 at 03:24 PM.
#20
For me it is a no-go. I agree that for that price it should have nicer componentry. 8 speed is probably enough for your typical "city riding", so that doesn't bother me, but Shimano 2303? Not. If that is the only component group Shimano has in 8 speed, I'd pass.
To me, it should be around $800.00 max.
I would look at other options. I just saw a Salsa Cassaroll with 9 speed 105 group on sale the other day for the same price. It would be a much better deal. I suggest you keep looking.
To me, it should be around $800.00 max.
I would look at other options. I just saw a Salsa Cassaroll with 9 speed 105 group on sale the other day for the same price. It would be a much better deal. I suggest you keep looking.
#21
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For me it is a no-go. I agree that for that price it should have nicer componentry. 8 speed is probably enough for your typical "city riding", so that doesn't bother me, but Shimano 2303? Not. If that is the only component group Shimano has in 8 speed, I'd pass.
To me, it should be around $800.00 max.
I would look at other options. I just saw a Salsa Cassaroll with 9 speed 105 group on sale the other day for the same price. It would be a much better deal. I suggest you keep looking.
To me, it should be around $800.00 max.
I would look at other options. I just saw a Salsa Cassaroll with 9 speed 105 group on sale the other day for the same price. It would be a much better deal. I suggest you keep looking.
#22
Rain, rain go away
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 351
Bikes: 2009 Schwinn Sierra GS; 2010 Specialized Allez Elite Compact; 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I found that 2300 the biggest sticking point for me as well. I wonder why the Trek 1.2 costs about the same but has the sora/tiagra stuff instead. Could it be because this is deemed a "commuter/cyclocross" bike? Could the Shimano 2300 be more durable and able to withstand the abuse of such a bike vs. the need for speed of a 1.2?
#23
Member
I have read tons of negative reviews about the Trek Lane, but I thought it seemed like an ideal bike for me. I ride aprox 30 miles per ride aprox 3 times a week, i also am a heavier rider (270) so larger tires appealed to me. Long story short, I found a 2012 Lane advertised in my size on craigs list for $500.00 I had to buy it! I have to say its a great bike, while I would have preferred a triple in the front, the compact is fine for 90% of the hills I ride, I did swap the 11-28 for a 11-34 cassette with a long cage derauiller, the fact that i got a fantastic deal is not what makes me love this bike, it rides great! Granted i'm no racer, but I average 12.5mph over my 30 mile rides, the bike is smooth, stable and compfortable. I dont know why this bike is so under appreciated.
#24
Senior Member
I don't think the bike is the problem for most, it is the $1000+ price. I am very jealous that you've found a model that fits for $500. THAT is a great price for a decent ride! I am closely watching my LBS for some 12 clearance Lanes and Erwins as well!
Enjoy!!
Enjoy!!