Colnago Dream aluminum question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lancaster,CA the desert north of Los Angeles
Posts: 701
Bikes: 84' Ciocc, 79' Shogun 1000, 76' KHS Gran Sport, 96' Schwinn Super Sport,
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Colnago Dream aluminum question
I know this should go in the valuation section but I'm asking a little more in depth question. Why are they unpopular? They have all the looks of the steel frames and in some cases they wiegh less? They seem to be half the price of the steel frames but what should be the asking price? Are they prone to cracking or other problems that I have not heard of? Can they be called vintage or just old? when did they start-stop making them?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,949
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Liked 221 Times
in
137 Posts
Hi Alan,
I think the development of Carbon Fibre for bike frames became more economical and practical around the start of this century which attracted the new bike purchaser. Aluminium was on the way out.
I don't think there is anything 'wrong' with a Colnago Dream in aluminium, I just think it was the 'old' technology. I know they ride surprisingly well for an aluminium frame and are very stiff at the bottom bracket. When you put the effort into your pedal stroke, most of that effort is translated into forward motion. What I have noticed though is the paint seems to chip more easily than on a steel frame.
Personally I have not heard of one cracking.
Are they vintage or classic - no. They are only around 10 years old now.
I think the development of Carbon Fibre for bike frames became more economical and practical around the start of this century which attracted the new bike purchaser. Aluminium was on the way out.
I don't think there is anything 'wrong' with a Colnago Dream in aluminium, I just think it was the 'old' technology. I know they ride surprisingly well for an aluminium frame and are very stiff at the bottom bracket. When you put the effort into your pedal stroke, most of that effort is translated into forward motion. What I have noticed though is the paint seems to chip more easily than on a steel frame.
Personally I have not heard of one cracking.
Are they vintage or classic - no. They are only around 10 years old now.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
28 Posts
One cannot really say that Al frames are "prone" to cracking. It's just cracking which usually/eventually could lead to full failure is their failure mode and as long as an owner knows the limits of the material and does not abuse/overstress/overtighten things, an Al bike can last for years and years. In contrast, steel can take much more bending and deflection from accidents and abuse without catastrophic failure.
I think AL bikes just seem to have earned a reputation through the years of harsh ride qualities that kinda turned off many bikers away from them and back towards steel or to CF and Ti.
Chombi
I think AL bikes just seem to have earned a reputation through the years of harsh ride qualities that kinda turned off many bikers away from them and back towards steel or to CF and Ti.
Chombi
Last edited by Chombi; 08-26-11 at 05:42 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lancaster,CA the desert north of Los Angeles
Posts: 701
Bikes: 84' Ciocc, 79' Shogun 1000, 76' KHS Gran Sport, 96' Schwinn Super Sport,
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So ride quality may be an issue. Undesirable because they are old but not classic and a short run of only a couple years?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,949
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Liked 221 Times
in
137 Posts
Ride quality would be an issue if you were riding on particularly bad roads but on a reasonable surface they ride quite well. They are light and very responsive. Personally I was very surprised and pleased with the ride - it is a fast frame. I'm not sure about the production run on these frames but I would guess at 1999 to 2003 give or take a year. They also came with a Carbon rear end which must have made them more compliant. The carbon front fork usually had the cheaper aluminium steerer tube.
If you had an '03 aluminium Colnago and an '03 carbon Colnago sitting side by side and you were going to choose one to ride, I think you would choose the carbon Colnago 8 times out of 10.
If you had an '03 aluminium Colnago and an '03 carbon Colnago sitting side by side and you were going to choose one to ride, I think you would choose the carbon Colnago 8 times out of 10.
#6
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,764
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times
in
15 Posts
To hear the Cannondale owners, the stiffer the ride, the better.
I certainly wouldn't kick a Colnago Dream out of the garage. Very nice bikes. I know Orbea has made aluminum frames that weighed less than a kilogram. The Arin. Colnago Dream used Airplane tubing, shaped like the Master's steel tubing.
I certainly wouldn't kick a Colnago Dream out of the garage. Very nice bikes. I know Orbea has made aluminum frames that weighed less than a kilogram. The Arin. Colnago Dream used Airplane tubing, shaped like the Master's steel tubing.
#7
is just a real cool dude
I've got a Colnago Mix with has the carbon seat stays and scored mine for 250. I'm not going to argue why their so cheap because I'm happy with mine. I just posted about mine this past week. desirable or not I like it and that's all that matters.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lancaster,CA the desert north of Los Angeles
Posts: 701
Bikes: 84' Ciocc, 79' Shogun 1000, 76' KHS Gran Sport, 96' Schwinn Super Sport,
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thats what I wanted to hear, that it's a deal and not over priced. The steel frames go for the price of a new frame and the aluminum frames seem to be normaly priced or less. At present I'm looking at Dreams or cyclo crosses of the same years
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
17 Posts
I know this should go in the valuation section but I'm asking a little more in depth question. Why are they unpopular? They have all the looks of the steel frames and in some cases they wiegh less? They seem to be half the price of the steel frames but what should be the asking price? Are they prone to cracking or other problems that I have not heard of? Can they be called vintage or just old? when did they start-stop making them?
Check it out -
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...D-frames-DEATH
__________________
It never gets easier, you just go faster. ~ Greg LeMond
#10
Junior Member
I have the Asso model which is the all aluminum model before the Dream. My rear triangle is aluminum as well as the main tubes.
I like it - but it is harsher than my carbon bike.
But I have done centuries on it with no problem. And it is very light, at 18lbs, only 1 pound heavier than my carbon.
Ed
I like it - but it is harsher than my carbon bike.
But I have done centuries on it with no problem. And it is very light, at 18lbs, only 1 pound heavier than my carbon.
Ed
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Liked 1,127 Times
in
748 Posts
Most aluminum framesets of this vintage will limit you to 25c or so tires anyway so not much chance of running too much fatter
#13
Senior Member
Locally, we had a rash of Colnago Dream and Dream Plus with cracked head tubes, resulting from too tight a fit for the integral headsets.
Likes For T-Mar:
#14
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,626
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,959 Times
in
4,199 Posts
I have an aluminum Colnago VIP from 2001. I don't think it will take anything larger than a 23 because the rear end is so tight. It's actually one of the more comfortable road bikes I've ever owned. My carbon Time from the same era is definitely stiffer.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Platypus gravelus.