BB30 vs. GXP & Q-Factor
08-13-13, 12:22 PM
#1
Wat.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 53
Bikes: Marinoni Pista (650c), Gunnar Crosshairs, Yakota Twin Peaks Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BB30 vs. GXP & Q-Factor
So, in theory BB30 setups are able to have a lower Q-factor than GXP because the bearings sit inside the frame. Does anyone know if this is true in practice? Would it affect chainline then as well?
I.e., If I have BB30 SRAM Force cranks set up with a corresponding BB30 frame, will the Q-factor be lower than a GXP SRAM Force set up with a corresponding 68mm threaded frame?
For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor_(bicycles)
I've got a GXP SRAM Red crank now, and with a little bit of wheeling and dealing can end up with a BB30 Force crank for my BB30 frame. Will I just save 100 grams in making the switch, or will the Q-factor be reduced as well?
I.e., If I have BB30 SRAM Force cranks set up with a corresponding BB30 frame, will the Q-factor be lower than a GXP SRAM Force set up with a corresponding 68mm threaded frame?
For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor_(bicycles)
I've got a GXP SRAM Red crank now, and with a little bit of wheeling and dealing can end up with a BB30 Force crank for my BB30 frame. Will I just save 100 grams in making the switch, or will the Q-factor be reduced as well?
08-13-13, 02:00 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,571
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1853 Post(s)
Liked 680 Times
in
431 Posts
BB30 cranks do have a slightly narrower Q-factor. But it is not substantial, and it's pretty much not noticeable. VeloNews did a comparison a couple years ago. If you google it, you might find it.
