How many miles is considered an endurance ride?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Posts: 291
Bikes: 2015 Kona Rove AL, 2016 Giant Escape 2, 1995 Giant attraction SS,
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How many miles is considered an endurance ride?
Just out of curiosity. I'm interested in hearing people's different opinions. How many miles a ride needs to be for you to consider it an endurance ride in your opinion? What about ultra endurance?
#2
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,533
Liked 3,830 Times
in
2,608 Posts
According to randonneurs, 200km is a short ride. And really, that's my cutoff to just drop everything and go for a ride.
I have trouble making this sort of classification because I know that as long as I eat I can just keep riding.
I have trouble making this sort of classification because I know that as long as I eat I can just keep riding.
#3
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Liked 599 Times
in
331 Posts
In this forum, 100K is sort of a practice ride, and 100 miles is the gateway to endurance.
IMO the 400K or 24-hour point is probably the gateway to ultra endurance.
IMO the 400K or 24-hour point is probably the gateway to ultra endurance.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I suppose it depends upon who you are riding with, I've been on a couple of 15-20 mile rides that required a lot of endurance because of the person I was with....some people you just shouldn't ride with.
In reality, it depends upon where you are riding, the terrain, etc. I've ridden across the Cascade Mountains in Washington, and it was easy. It did not require much endurance, just persistence. On the other hand, some rides in Appalachia, WV and Pennsylvania, much shorter rides were much, much harder, with just one steep hill after another with 7-8-9-10-11-12-13% grades, and the front wheel wanting to lift off the ground if you dared to stand up and push on the pedals harder and the rear wanting to spin out if you, so you had to sit down and crank judiciously while leaning over the front bars (52-39 front crank and a six speed freewheel though, it was a few years ago).
On one of those rides, my brother finally gave in and I had to go for the truck and come back and get him. I don't think we went 40 miles but it was a road that we never rode on again, in fact I think he never rode with me after that.
On the other hand, I've ridden in Michigan, and people were like "you ride all those hills" and I'm like "What are you talking about, what hills?" Where I lived there, I just rode till I got bored and then went home. Where I grew up, and where I was like the only bike rider I ever saw, we didn't even call those "rises" hills, until someone asked me that question in 1985, I had seriously thought and referred to the area as all "flat ground".
In reality, it depends upon where you are riding, the terrain, etc. I've ridden across the Cascade Mountains in Washington, and it was easy. It did not require much endurance, just persistence. On the other hand, some rides in Appalachia, WV and Pennsylvania, much shorter rides were much, much harder, with just one steep hill after another with 7-8-9-10-11-12-13% grades, and the front wheel wanting to lift off the ground if you dared to stand up and push on the pedals harder and the rear wanting to spin out if you, so you had to sit down and crank judiciously while leaning over the front bars (52-39 front crank and a six speed freewheel though, it was a few years ago).
On one of those rides, my brother finally gave in and I had to go for the truck and come back and get him. I don't think we went 40 miles but it was a road that we never rode on again, in fact I think he never rode with me after that.
On the other hand, I've ridden in Michigan, and people were like "you ride all those hills" and I'm like "What are you talking about, what hills?" Where I lived there, I just rode till I got bored and then went home. Where I grew up, and where I was like the only bike rider I ever saw, we didn't even call those "rises" hills, until someone asked me that question in 1985, I had seriously thought and referred to the area as all "flat ground".
#5
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida suncoast
Posts: 40
Bikes: 2014 Blue Tommasini Techno 1998 Black Tommasini Techno
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For me personally it was my first 300km that made me feel like a distance cyclist. The day after I went down to Piedmont Park in Atlanta to watch a pro race. The park was full of recreational cyclists, many of them accomplished riders themselves, watching the race and it occurred to me that very, very few of them had ever ridden as far as I had on the 300km.
#6
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Liked 599 Times
in
331 Posts
For me, my second century broke through the first long distance barrier. When I completed my first century, I vowed never to ride another one again.
When I finished my second century, I was hooked ...
My first 300K randonnee broke through the second long distance barrier. The 300Ks in Manitoba were 318 km, if I recall, which is so close to a double century that when I rode my first 300K, I rode the extra bit and completed a double century.
After that ... the possibilities just opened up.
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
My first 300K randonnee broke through the second long distance barrier. The 300Ks in Manitoba were 318 km, if I recall, which is so close to a double century that when I rode my first 300K, I rode the extra bit and completed a double century.
After that ... the possibilities just opened up.
![Smilie](images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,006
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,010 Times
in
1,257 Posts
An endurance ride is a distance you've never ridden before, and can just barely imagine riding.
An ultra endurance ride is one that other people have to be crazy to try.
An ultra endurance ride is one that other people have to be crazy to try.
![Smilie](images/smilies/smile.gif)
#8
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
In reality, it depends upon where you are riding, the terrain, etc. I've ridden across the Cascade Mountains in Washington, and it was easy. It did not require much endurance, just persistence. On the other hand, some rides in Appalachia, WV and Pennsylvania, much shorter rides were much, much harder, with just one steep hill after another with 7-8-9-10-11-12-13% grades, and the front wheel wanting to lift off the ground if you dared to stand up and push on the pedals harder and the rear wanting to spin out if you, so you had to sit down and crank judiciously while leaning over the front bars (52-39 front crank and a six speed freewheel though, it was a few years ago).
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,652
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,586 Posts
+1. To further muddy the waters, riding from one end of the block to another may be so dubious as to be considered "endurance." We all start from a different place.
![Smilie](images/smilies/smile.gif)
#11
Uber Goober
I don't normally use those terms, so I never thought to define them.
How short does a ride have to be before it's considered a "short" ride? I've never heard anyone say that 3 miles was "short" but 3.1 miles was not.
How short does a ride have to be before it's considered a "short" ride? I've never heard anyone say that 3 miles was "short" but 3.1 miles was not.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#12
www.ocrebels.com
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 6,186
Bikes: Several bikes, Road, Mountain, Commute, etc.
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
2 Posts
This really is a case of YMMV (You mileage may vary). Unless there is an important (to you) reason to define such terms . . . it really doesn't matter. So everyone's answer is liable to be different.
For me, 100 miles in one day defines "Endurance" and 200 miles or more in one day defines "Ultra Endruance."
However, your mileage may (and probably will) vary.
Rick / OCRR
For me, 100 miles in one day defines "Endurance" and 200 miles or more in one day defines "Ultra Endruance."
However, your mileage may (and probably will) vary.
Rick / OCRR
#13
Dharma Dog
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,073
Bikes: Rodriguez Shiftless street fixie with S&S couplers, Kuwahara tandem, Trek carbon, Dolan track
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Depends on the context. On the road, I think that if you need to carry food (or a bottle, or two bottles), it's an endurance ride. Otherwise, it's more of a sprint, like riding to work. Unless you need to carry food or a bottle to get to work.
On the track, they divide the events into "sprint" and "endurance." So sprint events are: match sprint, kilo, 500 meters, team sprint. 1,000 meters is probably the longest distance, and all the events are very explosive. The endurance events are: all the mass start races, pursuits, madison. So basically anything more than 2,000 meters. But then these are ridden very, very fast indeed. You really do need endurance for them!
But then, I've been on early season century rides where I didn't even carry a bottle. i just stopped at all the food stops, the temps were too cool to need anything to drink while riding, and I could get all the food I needed at the stops.
If you start in the morning and you need to carry lights on the bike, it's gotta be ultra!
Luis
On the track, they divide the events into "sprint" and "endurance." So sprint events are: match sprint, kilo, 500 meters, team sprint. 1,000 meters is probably the longest distance, and all the events are very explosive. The endurance events are: all the mass start races, pursuits, madison. So basically anything more than 2,000 meters. But then these are ridden very, very fast indeed. You really do need endurance for them!
But then, I've been on early season century rides where I didn't even carry a bottle. i just stopped at all the food stops, the temps were too cool to need anything to drink while riding, and I could get all the food I needed at the stops.
If you start in the morning and you need to carry lights on the bike, it's gotta be ultra!
Luis
#14
Full Member
Since I consider anything over 2-3 hours an "endurance ride", I guess miles wise that would be anywhere from 20-60 miles and up (dependent on ability). The term "Ultra" is usually reserved for long distance races which start at 12hr's for timed races, and 200 miles for distance races.
#16
Expired Member
I think for the purposes of this forum and generally for most cyclists, over 100 miles is the minimum distance that would be considered "long distance" cycling. Certainly a shorter ride can require "endurance" but that isn't what we discuss here. Most cycling enthusiasts do century rides, it's not uncommon or especially noteworthy. When one gets into multiple hundreds of kilometers it becomes a different sort of cycling, worthy of a sub-forum. JMO.
#17
Jedi Master
#18
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,638
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,004 Times
in
1,423 Posts
It varies with the rider. You start building endurance when you start to endure. Ultra endurance is when all you want to do is quit.