Why do many bicycle manufacturers not list the weights on their bikes?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Why do many bicycle manufacturers not list the weights on their bikes?
Hi!
I'm interested in buying the 2025 "New Giant TCR but neither that model or previous TCR models are listed with weight on the web in their specification. For me its like show me what you have in detail, and you have a potential buyer, if not its turn around.
Rant over.
hsea17
I'm interested in buying the 2025 "New Giant TCR but neither that model or previous TCR models are listed with weight on the web in their specification. For me its like show me what you have in detail, and you have a potential buyer, if not its turn around.
Rant over.
hsea17
#2
Senior Member
That's like trying to give a catalog weight to humans by demographics.
There are infinitely too many factors.
Consider something simple. Every rider chooses their tyres. Tyres can vary by weight vastly. TPU vs latex? Tyre liner or not?
Same goes with saddles, seat posts, pedals, cable housing. Basically if it can be removed from the bike, it has its own weight.
Another thing I can think of is change in manufacturing. The "same" bike can indeed vary by weight, and wrong would still be wrong in this woke day and age. Manufacturers don't want to defend themselves just because someone caught them underweighing a bike by 50 grams.
A LBS would be more than happy to help a buyer using a scale in their store, this has never been an issue.
There are infinitely too many factors.
Consider something simple. Every rider chooses their tyres. Tyres can vary by weight vastly. TPU vs latex? Tyre liner or not?
Same goes with saddles, seat posts, pedals, cable housing. Basically if it can be removed from the bike, it has its own weight.
Another thing I can think of is change in manufacturing. The "same" bike can indeed vary by weight, and wrong would still be wrong in this woke day and age. Manufacturers don't want to defend themselves just because someone caught them underweighing a bike by 50 grams.
A LBS would be more than happy to help a buyer using a scale in their store, this has never been an issue.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,336
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,416 Times
in
1,363 Posts
Every frame size varies in weight. They also swap parts, tires, etc…. Over a product line, thus weights for a given size will vary.
Likes For ACHiPo:
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
That's like trying to give a catalog weight to humans by demographics.
There are infinitely too many factors.
Consider something simple. Every rider chooses their tyres. Tyres can vary by weight vastly. TPU vs latex? Tyre liner or not?
Same goes with saddles, seat posts, pedals, cable housing. Basically if it can be removed from the bike, it has its own weight.
Another thing I can think of is change in manufacturing. The "same" bike can indeed vary by weight, and wrong would still be wrong in this woke day and age. Manufacturers don't want to defend themselves just because someone caught them underweighing a bike by 50 grams.
A LBS would be more than happy to help a buyer using a scale in their store, this has never been an issue.
There are infinitely too many factors.
Consider something simple. Every rider chooses their tyres. Tyres can vary by weight vastly. TPU vs latex? Tyre liner or not?
Same goes with saddles, seat posts, pedals, cable housing. Basically if it can be removed from the bike, it has its own weight.
Another thing I can think of is change in manufacturing. The "same" bike can indeed vary by weight, and wrong would still be wrong in this woke day and age. Manufacturers don't want to defend themselves just because someone caught them underweighing a bike by 50 grams.
A LBS would be more than happy to help a buyer using a scale in their store, this has never been an issue.
No, it does not hold water. It's like saying that when a car manufacturer states a weight for a certain model, spesific engine and size that they can't do it because maybe the buyer puts on different tires (heavier/lighter), extra lights and installs a big music system in the car. Well, I'm talking about the specified weight of each specific model before the buyer makes their modifications. Withholding information about the product is the kindest thing I call it.
hsea17
Likes For hsea17:
Likes For sean.hwy:
#7
Senior Member
Years of previous threads on the topic of bike weights, including the "why don't manufacturers list bike weights?" topic.
Example from one of those threads:
"The issue is that if they get it wrong and underestimate, then they could be liable for the "false" claims of lightness. Strikes me that there's a comparatively high margin of error in the components and the subcomponents (tape, spoke nipples, chain lube, bearings?) and that companies don't find that risk worth it."
Example from one of those threads:
"The issue is that if they get it wrong and underestimate, then they could be liable for the "false" claims of lightness. Strikes me that there's a comparatively high margin of error in the components and the subcomponents (tape, spoke nipples, chain lube, bearings?) and that companies don't find that risk worth it."
Last edited by Trakhak; 03-31-24 at 04:20 AM.
#8
Giant say this about bike weights:-
“The most accurate way to determine any bike’s weight is to have your local dealer weigh it for you. Many brands strive to list the lowest possible weight, but in reality weight can vary based on size, finish, hardware and accessories. All our bikes are designed for best-in-class weight and ride quality”
Some other manufacturers do list specific weights for each model and spec eg Canyon.
Personally, I think it would be useful to list comparative weights of their various models and spec options. They could add a disclaimer for legal protection, but Canyon don’t appear to have one. But they don’t list specific bike weights for all frame sizes. They just list a single weight for each bike model and component build spec.
“The most accurate way to determine any bike’s weight is to have your local dealer weigh it for you. Many brands strive to list the lowest possible weight, but in reality weight can vary based on size, finish, hardware and accessories. All our bikes are designed for best-in-class weight and ride quality”
Some other manufacturers do list specific weights for each model and spec eg Canyon.
Personally, I think it would be useful to list comparative weights of their various models and spec options. They could add a disclaimer for legal protection, but Canyon don’t appear to have one. But they don’t list specific bike weights for all frame sizes. They just list a single weight for each bike model and component build spec.
#9
”* Weights based on production painted frames as pictured. Actual weights will vary based on colorway, frame size, and component variation. Specifications are subject to change without notice.”
Likes For indyfabz:
#10
If you Google the weight of any specific bike you can usually get a good idea from reviews and forum chat. For this bike, frame weight is apparently 690g and their flagship complete bike is 6.4 kg. This was a 5 sec Google for “2025 Gisnt TCR weight”.
Likes For PeteHski:
#11
Senior Member
Every bike doesn't list weight because it isn't all that important in those particular models. Anyone obsessed about getting the lightest possible bike in the style they want will gravitate towards particular bikes designed on purpose to be light. For those bikes it's pretty easy to find weight. For similar bikes with similar weights, it really doesn't matter. You aren't going to tell much difference between a 35 lb. bike and a 32 lb. bike. You will tell a huge difference between a 35 lb. bike and an 18 lb. bike; both in riding and especially in price.
Likes For RH Clark:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,196
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Liked 2,063 Times
in
988 Posts
Unless you are racing, what is the issue over weight?
I'm a bigger guy, I would want a heavier duty frame and wheelset that would weigh more.
I'm a bigger guy, I would want a heavier duty frame and wheelset that would weigh more.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Liked 638 Times
in
484 Posts
"Weight-weenie" stuff is a whole other kettle of fish.
#14
Senior Member
No, it does not hold water. It's like saying that when a car manufacturer states a weight for a certain model, spesific engine and size that they can't do it because maybe the buyer puts on different tires (heavier/lighter), extra lights and installs a big music system in the car. Well, I'm talking about the specified weight of each specific model before the buyer makes their modifications. Withholding information about the product is the kindest thing I call it.
hsea17
hsea17
Also they may not want to lies or at least misleads about weight, but also not be unfavorably compared to another brand who does. Weighing one on the showroom floor or getting a report from a reputable review or someone you trust is probably better than counting in the listed weight any way.
#15
If you are comparing different build specs of the same bike, then weight is one of the main parameters that will differentiate them. Same applies when comparing aero vs climbing road bikes. It’s just useful to know what those weight differences actually are. I think some manufacturers are just lazy in not bothering to list specific build weights. I don’t think Giant are trying to hide anything in this case. I’m sure the TCR is competitively light, but it would be nice to compare the various build weights without having to Google it.
#16
I don't think they are referring to changes the customers make, but rather changes that may occur in production of the bike and its components. Over time they change what components they use also the component manufacturers may supply different weight items especially for items like tires where the same model may vary in weight over time and production runs
#17
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#18
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,344
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Liked 1,877 Times
in
1,066 Posts
In summary: Nothing to gain & a whole lot to lose.
What weight & where is perhaps a more important metric anyway. A 9 pound crank set is going to feel and ride different than a 9 pound saddle or handlebar.
If you want weights, you gotta buy a bike by individual components.
What weight & where is perhaps a more important metric anyway. A 9 pound crank set is going to feel and ride different than a 9 pound saddle or handlebar.
If you want weights, you gotta buy a bike by individual components.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 962
Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike
Liked 583 Times
in
332 Posts
Just because we are the way we are, Mrs. Dan and I decided to weigh some nominally identical cans of beverages. We used a calibrated scale accurate to 0.1 grams.
The weights were+- 5 grams. Now, add up those tolerances on something small like a bicycle and you will have a weight range. Since too many people are clueless, the manufacturer is just asking for trouble if they post a single weight.
All of the wheel sets I have bought listed the weight to some tolerance, like +- 40 grams. That gives them a bit of wiggle room, and gives me an actionable measurement.
If you are really concerned, and you want to know +- 0.1 grams, maybe get a pair of reasonable quality scales and weigh the particular bike.
The weights were+- 5 grams. Now, add up those tolerances on something small like a bicycle and you will have a weight range. Since too many people are clueless, the manufacturer is just asking for trouble if they post a single weight.
All of the wheel sets I have bought listed the weight to some tolerance, like +- 40 grams. That gives them a bit of wiggle room, and gives me an actionable measurement.
If you are really concerned, and you want to know +- 0.1 grams, maybe get a pair of reasonable quality scales and weigh the particular bike.
Likes For DangerousDanR:
#20
Nonetheless the OP is right. If carmakers can publish curb weights for all their cars there is no reason why bike makers avoid doing so.
#21
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,671
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,569 Times
in
3,060 Posts
This is an excellent article from R+E cycles who have had a bike shop since the 70s and have been making bicycles in that time as well.
https://www.rodbikes.com/articles/we...-a-minute.html
I wouldn't trust published weights from any manufacturer because of the variations in everything and their want to sell the product. I could say get a production sample to 13lbs but the actual bike rideable is 16lbs which one are you going to want to here? You like the idea of lightweight but the bike is heavier in real life. A road bike for instance should have handlebar tape, tubes and tires, a saddle and all of the bolts normally there. If you are weighing it without that stuff or some of it you are lying and it doesn't help anyone in that situation.
In truth bike weight really doesn't matter too much to most people in reality yes we love a ultralight bike but in truth riding it we won't notice to a point so why obsess over it. Especially with a manufacturer. If you are concerned your local shop will likely be able to weigh it but even then it is a production bike so if you are super concerned with weight you probably won't be buying a production bike (maybe a frame) because production bikes generally are built to hold up to a wide variety of people so they will probably be heavier and more overbuilt for a weight weenie.
https://www.rodbikes.com/articles/we...-a-minute.html
I wouldn't trust published weights from any manufacturer because of the variations in everything and their want to sell the product. I could say get a production sample to 13lbs but the actual bike rideable is 16lbs which one are you going to want to here? You like the idea of lightweight but the bike is heavier in real life. A road bike for instance should have handlebar tape, tubes and tires, a saddle and all of the bolts normally there. If you are weighing it without that stuff or some of it you are lying and it doesn't help anyone in that situation.
In truth bike weight really doesn't matter too much to most people in reality yes we love a ultralight bike but in truth riding it we won't notice to a point so why obsess over it. Especially with a manufacturer. If you are concerned your local shop will likely be able to weigh it but even then it is a production bike so if you are super concerned with weight you probably won't be buying a production bike (maybe a frame) because production bikes generally are built to hold up to a wide variety of people so they will probably be heavier and more overbuilt for a weight weenie.
#22
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
#23
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,056
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,078 Times
in
4,482 Posts
Example from one of those threads:
"The issue is that if they get it wrong and underestimate, then they could be liable for the "false" claims of lightness. Strikes me that there's a comparatively high margin of error in the components and the subcomponents (tape, spoke nipples, chain lube, bearings?) and that companies don't find that risk worth it."
#24
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
Likes For terrymorse:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
The bicycle industry is somewhat self defeating in this.
For years weight has been a significant driver in selling higher end bikes.
Even with components, there will be some slight performance benefits going from 105 to Dura Ace. But finish and weight is generally touted. The downside is longevity might not be any better.
Wheelsets are even more dubious with separate training and racing sets while many in the real world tout little advantage for a lower weight for the average cyclist.
I acknowledge there is a difference between a recreational and professional. But for an industry that seems to rely on weight reduction as an upsell benefit, it sure doesn’t want to lie in the bed they made.
John
For years weight has been a significant driver in selling higher end bikes.
Even with components, there will be some slight performance benefits going from 105 to Dura Ace. But finish and weight is generally touted. The downside is longevity might not be any better.
Wheelsets are even more dubious with separate training and racing sets while many in the real world tout little advantage for a lower weight for the average cyclist.
I acknowledge there is a difference between a recreational and professional. But for an industry that seems to rely on weight reduction as an upsell benefit, it sure doesn’t want to lie in the bed they made.
John
Likes For 70sSanO: