Fast vs Slow Touring Bikes ?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Fast vs Slow Touring Bikes ?
I've read that Surly's LHT/DT is considered a slow touring bike .
Which brand/models are considered fast touring bikes ?
Which brand/models are considered fast touring bikes ?
Likes For headwind15:
#3
Senior Member
I had an older Trek 520, I think late 90's. It rode like a traditional road bike, I'm not sure how the newer 520's are.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
You actually can tour on a faster road bike if you can pare down the load, and if comfort is secondary to speed. One 2000 mile trip on a road bike convinced me that wasn't the best idea for me, but it works for others. I know a guy (in his seventies) who tours extensively on a CF frame while carrying minimal gear in a small backpack.
Last edited by andrewclaus; 08-02-20 at 01:51 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times
in
1,144 Posts
When i was touring in Iceland, I met a couple that rode Ritchey Break Away bikes with bike packing gear, no racks. With Break Away bikes (the frame splits to pack the bike in a smaller case) and by packing light they only checked their bike cases, they carried the rest of their gear for a two week tour in their carry on bags on the plane.
I did not ask their permission to post photos on internet, so I cropped out their faces from photos.
There is no way that I would have wanted to pack that light for a two week trip in a place where it rains and gets windy cold, but it worked for them. I was carrying a lot more stuff on my slow bike.
I did not ask their permission to post photos on internet, so I cropped out their faces from photos.
There is no way that I would have wanted to pack that light for a two week trip in a place where it rains and gets windy cold, but it worked for them. I was carrying a lot more stuff on my slow bike.
#6
Senior Member
hit the nail in the head there monsieur.
and as stated, also the one with the lightest load. Most "touring bikes" that will be still be competent and not overstressed with a reasonable amount of touring load, tend to weigh in at the high 20s, close to 30lbs with pedals, bottle cages, racks, maybe fenders. So if you carry 25lbs of stuff on top of that, or 45lbs, this is always going to be the big factor in how fast one actually pedals along...
yesterday, I loaded up my bike for the first time in a long while, and man was it slow.
and as stated, also the one with the lightest load. Most "touring bikes" that will be still be competent and not overstressed with a reasonable amount of touring load, tend to weigh in at the high 20s, close to 30lbs with pedals, bottle cages, racks, maybe fenders. So if you carry 25lbs of stuff on top of that, or 45lbs, this is always going to be the big factor in how fast one actually pedals along...
yesterday, I loaded up my bike for the first time in a long while, and man was it slow.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
hit the nail in the head there monsieur.
and as stated, also the one with the lightest load. Most "touring bikes" that will be still be competent and not overstressed with a reasonable amount of touring load, tend to weigh in at the high 20s, close to 30lbs with pedals, bottle cages, racks, maybe fenders. So if you carry 25lbs of stuff on top of that, or 45lbs, this is always going to be the big factor in how fast one actually pedals along...
yesterday, I loaded up my bike for the first time in a long while, and man was it slow.
and as stated, also the one with the lightest load. Most "touring bikes" that will be still be competent and not overstressed with a reasonable amount of touring load, tend to weigh in at the high 20s, close to 30lbs with pedals, bottle cages, racks, maybe fenders. So if you carry 25lbs of stuff on top of that, or 45lbs, this is always going to be the big factor in how fast one actually pedals along...
yesterday, I loaded up my bike for the first time in a long while, and man was it slow.
#8
Senior Member
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,244
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18420 Post(s)
Liked 15,563 Times
in
7,333 Posts
How much touring have you done, OP?
#10
Senior Member
Likes For saddlesores:
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If you’re up for packing light and travelling fast, you can’t go past the Diamondback Haanjo EXP.
https://www.cyclingabout.com/best-touring-bikes-2020/
https://www.cyclingabout.com/best-touring-bikes-2020/
#12
Senior Member
Fast? Is it a race? My bikepacking routes take me on dirt roads, bikepaths, single track and the occasional " off road/trail/ bushwacking. Only use pave to connect them. My Krampus with 3" tires is wicked fast. Never had another Krampus pass me. Is your goal to be head down on aerobars all day? Or sitting up taking in the sights and sounds that nature provides. The fast is up to the rider, really.
#13
Banned
People tour on race bikes the race-tour TransAm most did.
one guy rode/drove a streamlined velomobile.
he had the aerodynamic advantage higher speed the greater the advantage but a weight disadvantage..
one guy rode/drove a streamlined velomobile.
he had the aerodynamic advantage higher speed the greater the advantage but a weight disadvantage..
Likes For fietsbob:
#14
Senior Member
now there you go, aerokings them things. Twice my wife and I have been on a quebec based organized large group trip and there's a guy who has come with his velomobile--coolest things ever, and I can attest that they kick ass on a straightaway or a slight downhill. He has passed me a few times and woooooooooooosh there he goes past!
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
Pakeboi's carbon Diamondback Haanjo EXP pick is probably what I'd go with, too (Pakeboi's link: Here Are The 12 Best Touring Bikes You Can Buy In 2020). But the writer notes that "my other lightweight bike of choice is the flat bar Salsa Journeyman"; aluminum, $800 cheaper. I'd be inclined to take either of those over a steel bike, especially for loaded touring, since I've never cared for the way heavily laden steel frames tend to wallow down the road, especially when pedaling out of the saddle.
Last edited by Trakhak; 08-02-20 at 12:57 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Any bike designed for full-on loaded touring is going to slower than other light or general purpose bikes. Since you mentioned that Surly LHT we can compare it with their Cross Check. The X-Check is more of a general-purpose/light touring bike so it will be faster and more nimble, this can't carry as much weight as the LHT. I'm more familiar with Kona bikes and the same is true of their Sutra and Rove models. The Sutra is a loaded touring bike that's probably a bit faster and nimbler than the LHT but not by much. The Rove is a faster, nimbler gravel/all-road model suitable for light touring and commuting.
So ultimately that's the trade-off. If you're only doing light touring and don't carry that much weight any number of reasonably fast bikes are suitable, but a loaded touring bike is going to be a little heavier and less nimble. There's no way around this trade-off.
So ultimately that's the trade-off. If you're only doing light touring and don't carry that much weight any number of reasonably fast bikes are suitable, but a loaded touring bike is going to be a little heavier and less nimble. There's no way around this trade-off.
Likes For AlanK:
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Any bike designed for full-on loaded touring is going to slower than other light or general purpose bikes. Since you mentioned that Surly LHT we can compare it with their Cross Check. The X-Check is more of a general-purpose/light touring bike so it will be faster and more nimble, this can't carry as much weight as the LHT. I'm more familiar with Kona bikes and the same is true of their Sutra and Rove models. The Sutra is a loaded touring bike that's probably a bit faster and nimbler than the LHT but not by much. The Rove is a faster, nimbler gravel/all-road model suitable for light touring and commuting.
So ultimately that's the trade-off. If you're only doing light touring and don't carry that much weight any number of reasonably fast bikes are suitable, but a loaded touring bike is going to be a little heavier and less nimble. There's no way around this trade-off.
So ultimately that's the trade-off. If you're only doing light touring and don't carry that much weight any number of reasonably fast bikes are suitable, but a loaded touring bike is going to be a little heavier and less nimble. There's no way around this trade-off.
I realize for light touring almost any bike will do but I'm curious if there is a light touring bike(s) that dominates the category the way LHT/DT dominates touring bikes ?
#18
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,627
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1670 Post(s)
Liked 1,825 Times
in
1,062 Posts
Maybe a bike like the Specialized Turbo Creo SL Comp Carbon EVO or Trek Domane+ LT, with bike packing bags for minimalist gear.
#19
Senior Member
Probably not, though the LHT doesn't really 'dominate' the way it used to. For awhile it was very much the quintessential touring bike but it doesn't seem to be anymore and since there are several worthy models: The Kona Sutra, Salsa Marrakesh, REI Co-Op Adv models, and probably many other I can't think of right now.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,244
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18420 Post(s)
Liked 15,563 Times
in
7,333 Posts
#21
Senior Member
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,244
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18420 Post(s)
Liked 15,563 Times
in
7,333 Posts
Yup. 2008. Started and ended at some ski area in Tingwick. It rained every day while we were riding, except for the first day, when it didn't start raining until the evening. Stayed in Lac-Megentic for two nights. Before the tragedy. The cars of those who did not arrive to the start early had to park in a farm field. Most cars ended up sinking into the mud and had to be towed out by farm equipment. Couldn't wait to get out of Dodge when the event was over. Made it as far as Plattsburg, NY, and got a motel room. But the food was really good. Had duck the first night.
#23
Senior Member
Yup. 2008. Started and ended at some ski area in Tingwick. It rained every day while we were riding, except for the first day, when it didn't start raining until the evening. Stayed in Lac-Megentic for two nights. Before the tragedy. The cars of those who did not arrive to the start early had to park in a farm field. Most cars ended up sinking into the mud and had to be towed out by farm equipment. Couldn't wait to get out of Dodge when the event was over. Made it as far as Plattsburg, NY, and got a motel room. But the food was really good. Had duck the first night.
#24
Senior Member
i guess if i had money to throw around things would be fine, but I don't so I often just stick with what I presently have.