Zwift Layoffs, Discontinues Zwift Hub Trainer
#1
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,213
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3519 Post(s)
Liked 3,657 Times
in
1,833 Posts
Zwift Layoffs, Discontinues Zwift Hub Trainer
TL;DR -- Zwift is transitioning from a startup company with insanely high valuation, to a startup company that can't raise more capital. And oh yeah, Zwift Hub is going away.
From DC Rainmaker: Zwift Lays off 100+, co-CEO Resigns, Zwift Hub Series Discontinued
From Zwift:
From DC Rainmaker: Zwift Lays off 100+, co-CEO Resigns, Zwift Hub Series Discontinued
From Zwift:
We have seen accelerated growth over the last year but in the current environment, we must focus on sustainable and efficient growth.
Translation: Our infinite source of money has dried up, because we didn't grow fast enough to satisfy investor greed.
Likes For terrymorse:
#2
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,142
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1802 Post(s)
Liked 1,659 Times
in
950 Posts
How much does it cost to keep the current servers running? It seems to me as long as the data center cost is covered they can still break even.
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#3
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,213
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3519 Post(s)
Liked 3,657 Times
in
1,833 Posts
The CEO stated that he wants to grow subscriptions to 10 million and go public. Not likely.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,316
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1149 Post(s)
Liked 1,191 Times
in
692 Posts
probably has more to do with results than greed regarding the drying up of VC money. and not every subscriber is a full time subscriber so 41mil/year is probably very generous.
what is the cost to run a server farm?
maybe salaries are too high for some?
what is the cost to run a server farm?
maybe salaries are too high for some?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,918
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 778 Post(s)
Liked 1,790 Times
in
1,033 Posts
Could be part of the Wahoo lawsuit that went away, so they got out of the hardware business.
#6
Full Member
That last round of funding was good for one year and covers at least those who were laid off. That's how the game is played. I'm surprised the VC let go of the man they brought in and kept the original founder. I guess they still see a return and postpone the immediate IPO route. Kurt must have pissed off the wrong people.
#7
Resident PIA
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 874
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked 368 Times
in
195 Posts
One oneders if they will continue to sponsor the TDF Femmes.
.
.
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
#8
Hack
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
135 Posts
How much does it cost to keep the current servers running? It seems to me as long as the data center cost is covered they can still break even.
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 921
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
Liked 826 Times
in
422 Posts
As mentioned in the other thread on this.
The zwift hub deals have to be loss leaders, and maybe they are not paying out. At $600 per with free shipping, no doubt they lose money on each trainer - then 1 year free memberships. Lost money on the trainer and at least 12 months before they see any cash in return.
I was getting into a smart trainer this year no matter what. Was ready to purchase a trainer and a zwift membership, as was my FIL. Instead, we got the zwift hubs and free memberships, then we also got my son a hub. I know I will re up next year - but my FIL and 12 year old son??
The zwift hub deals have to be loss leaders, and maybe they are not paying out. At $600 per with free shipping, no doubt they lose money on each trainer - then 1 year free memberships. Lost money on the trainer and at least 12 months before they see any cash in return.
I was getting into a smart trainer this year no matter what. Was ready to purchase a trainer and a zwift membership, as was my FIL. Instead, we got the zwift hubs and free memberships, then we also got my son a hub. I know I will re up next year - but my FIL and 12 year old son??
#10
Senior Member
I think the way to get new subscribers is to add new worlds/routes. Improving the graphics would help too. Cutting staff seems to gut the ability to do either of those. AI might help with both of those. When I saw the discount "while they last" I thought the Zwift trainer was history.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,044
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1284 Post(s)
Liked 1,405 Times
in
714 Posts
How much does it cost to keep the current servers running? It seems to me as long as the data center cost is covered they can still break even.
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
2.5 million users x $16.50/mo is a lot of dollars cash flow. How do you go broke with $41 million dollars a month?
Is it that they are not profitable, or is it they are not profitable enough?
the typical SaaS business doesn’t spend more than 10% of their revenue on server hosting. maybe zwift is a little higher than usual for one reason or another, but it’s still not going to be a sizable percentage. although you could make it your goal to cut everything else but that, doing so would be a quick way to irrelevance and failure.
#12
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,142
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1802 Post(s)
Liked 1,659 Times
in
950 Posts
that’s oversimplifying their business, a lot. things go wrong. platforms or protocols change around you. users demand things be compatible with their new gear. users get confused or break things and need support. competitors will pop up and new features need to be considered or developed. payments need to be processed / payment processors paid. taxes need to be paid and tax laws in dozens of countries change. web pages need to be updated and maintained. you need people to do all of the above, and those people need to be paid, have benefits, have a place to work, that place needs to be maintained and run and paid for, etc etc etc.
the typical SaaS business doesn’t spend more than 10% of their revenue on server hosting. maybe zwift is a little higher than usual for one reason or another, but it’s still not going to be a sizable percentage. although you could make it your goal to cut everything else but that, doing so would be a quick way to irrelevance and failure.
the typical SaaS business doesn’t spend more than 10% of their revenue on server hosting. maybe zwift is a little higher than usual for one reason or another, but it’s still not going to be a sizable percentage. although you could make it your goal to cut everything else but that, doing so would be a quick way to irrelevance and failure.
If 10% is the cost of delivering the product,(server farm) then that leaves 90% left over to sustain and develop the business under whatever regulatory requirements apply.
What are they doing with that 90%? My guess is buckling under the pressure of initial VC contractual requirements to pay back "x" dollars by "x" timeframe. If that's the case, then the issue isn't so much as product viability, it's how hard VC wants to squeeze the golden goose. That issue can be negotiated.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,044
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1284 Post(s)
Liked 1,405 Times
in
714 Posts
…
If 10% is the cost of delivering the product,(server farm) then that leaves 90% left over to sustain and develop the business under whatever regulatory requirements apply.
What are they doing with that 90%? My guess is buckling under the pressure of initial VC contractual requirements to pay back "x" dollars by "x" timeframe. If that's the case, then the issue isn't so much as product viability, it's how hard VC wants to squeeze the golden goose. That issue can be negotiated.
If 10% is the cost of delivering the product,(server farm) then that leaves 90% left over to sustain and develop the business under whatever regulatory requirements apply.
What are they doing with that 90%? My guess is buckling under the pressure of initial VC contractual requirements to pay back "x" dollars by "x" timeframe. If that's the case, then the issue isn't so much as product viability, it's how hard VC wants to squeeze the golden goose. That issue can be negotiated.
venture is profit motivated, of course, but it is also a highly competitive space with multiple sources of capital competing for the same founders. we’ll never know the exact terms of their deal but the idea that zwift could continue to deliver their product with 10% (or some other random <50% number) the cost if they didn’t have to pay back the people who paid to build their business does not compute.
__________________
#14
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,463
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
518 Posts
Zwift is an interesting experiment in finding the least amount of visual and physics realism that you can have and still retain users. The climb portals and descending physics reveal that the floor is pretty low.
Likes For RChung:
#15
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,213
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3519 Post(s)
Liked 3,657 Times
in
1,833 Posts
Since I recently subscribed to Rouvy, I haven't used Zwift once. Rouvy feels real. Experiencing an iconic route without leaving home is pretty darn great. I fake-climbed Mt. Lemmon yesterday. It was bleepin' long, and my butt is paying the price today, but the immersive scenery was pretty great. The downside of Rouvy is that now I want to travel everywhere to ride these roads. Or maybe that's an upside.
#16
Hack
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
135 Posts
It doesn't really give you much except the ability to try it out - you can ride for 25km per month after the initial 2 week trial (I think - these deals are different per country and have changed over time)
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,009
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3984 Post(s)
Liked 7,435 Times
in
2,991 Posts
#18
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,142
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1802 Post(s)
Liked 1,659 Times
in
950 Posts
i think if we’re going to oversimplify their business, the better way to state it than “10% is the cost of delivering the product” is that 10% of their costs is the equivalent of the raw ingredients at a restaurant. you still need the recipes, the chefs, the restaurant, and a hundred other things.
venture is profit motivated, of course, but it is also a highly competitive space with multiple sources of capital competing for the same founders. we’ll never know the exact terms of their deal but the idea that zwift could continue to deliver their product with 10% (or some other random <50% number) the cost if they didn’t have to pay back the people who paid to build their business does not compute.
venture is profit motivated, of course, but it is also a highly competitive space with multiple sources of capital competing for the same founders. we’ll never know the exact terms of their deal but the idea that zwift could continue to deliver their product with 10% (or some other random <50% number) the cost if they didn’t have to pay back the people who paid to build their business does not compute.
I'm not daft. Sustaining cruise control is good 'till it ain't. But if their floor of existence to simply deliver the service and nothing more is "x" What are they doing with the rest? Paying taxes and global accounting can't possibly suck up 100% or more of the 90% that remains. That doesn't compute either. We don't disagree. We are just coming at it from opposite ends.
To play off the restaurant analogy: After the initial startup cost & build out, even a Fro-yo place has 1 employee, the service is all automatic. There is a lot of margin there to be had somewhere. Even a vending machine works for a time between servicing.
Perhaps with all the hard work of world development and game mechanics accomplished they are simply "right sizing" their workforce to more of a "sustain" mode. There is a right size for everything. Forcing growth/expansion beyond market demand is a sure-fire way to implode. Radio Shack, Quiznos, come to mind. Making the hard decision to reassess and course correct is the mark of a smartly run organization.
Last edited by base2; 02-09-24 at 02:30 PM.
Likes For spelger:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,316
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1149 Post(s)
Liked 1,191 Times
in
692 Posts
Zwift has all but lost me as a customer. Maybe the gaming features and look appeal to folks who are accustomed to that stuff, but I really want a realistic experience. I have never played games on a computer, so that gaming stuff is mostly just annoying.
Since I recently subscribed to Rouvy, I haven't used Zwift once. Rouvy feels real. Experiencing an iconic route without leaving home is pretty darn great. I fake-climbed Mt. Lemmon yesterday. It was bleepin' long, and my butt is paying the price today, but the immersive scenery was pretty great. The downside of Rouvy is that now I want to travel everywhere to ride these roads. Or maybe that's an upside.
Since I recently subscribed to Rouvy, I haven't used Zwift once. Rouvy feels real. Experiencing an iconic route without leaving home is pretty darn great. I fake-climbed Mt. Lemmon yesterday. It was bleepin' long, and my butt is paying the price today, but the immersive scenery was pretty great. The downside of Rouvy is that now I want to travel everywhere to ride these roads. Or maybe that's an upside.
the number one reason why i liked zwift was that i could turn down that road, or this road...and it was always nice having some rabbit to chase, or some dog to run from. i only get a littel of that in Rouvy.
Likes For spelger:
#21
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,425
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,724 Times
in
2,541 Posts
The Zwift hub experiment was nonsensical. I don't know if the free year really hurts them much, but it does seem that people that buy smart trainers often intend to subscribe to zwift.
#22
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,306
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2632 Post(s)
Liked 5,767 Times
in
2,972 Posts
Is the Hub One only designed to work with ZWIFT?
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
That’s a good question. I think the answer is probably no, but I think in the short term it effectively only works with Zwift because other apps don’t yet support the virtual gear shift. DC Rainmaker has a review explaining this, but I only skimmed it because I’m not in the market for a new trainer.
Likes For PeteHski:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
I was thinking along these lines too. Ultimately it’s a pretty niche market with limited growth potential. At this point, doesn’t nearly every cyclist who would be interested in a Smart Trainer already have one? At the same time, most of these indoor cyclists started out using Zwift and have now got a bit bored and started migrating to other cycling apps for variety. I just don’t see how Zwift can grow exponentially from here. It seems like the best they can hope to achieve is retaining their rather fickle existing customer base.
#25
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,681
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11035 Post(s)
Liked 7,585 Times
in
4,229 Posts
Maybe it's an interesting experiment in finding ways to turn a traditionally solo and closed off activity into a social and enjoyable activity.
Gamifying and socializing something that many have historically found to be boring or a chore is pretty cool for a lot of users.
But sure, someone could look at all of it with your perspective too.
Ends up that we all have different priorities when deciding what we value or use. Wild, right?
Likes For mstateglfr: