I got humbled (again) today out at Red Rock
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I got humbled (again) today out at Red Rock
Once again, I had to go in to Vegas today so I took a bike. I took the Ridley TT bike because I'm trying to get used to that bike for my triathlons. Anyway, I've ridden highway 159 (Red Rock Canyon Rd) a couple dozen times. I have a solid 30 mile route mapped out that had some good ups and down.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubiax out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubiax out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
Likes For VegasJen:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,383 Times
in
2,971 Posts
You're going to be even more humbled when you find out that it averages less than 4.5% and maxes out at about 9%.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7033 Post(s)
Liked 11,068 Times
in
4,729 Posts
Looks like the section you're talking about averages about a 3.6% grade with a max of 9.4%.
Last edited by Koyote; 05-05-23 at 09:21 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,337
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8310 Post(s)
Liked 9,104 Times
in
4,500 Posts
If you're going to be climbing you should figure out the low gear you might need. It doesn't have to be a triple up front. Until recently my double ring bike was geared lower than the one with the triple. Someone gave me a bigger cassette so now the triple is lower, but the point is my double ring bike is low enough for anything I do.
Modern compact doubles come lower still, mine is 12 years old and has a 34x29 low gear.
Modern compact doubles come lower still, mine is 12 years old and has a 34x29 low gear.
Likes For big john:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ya, I knew I was climbing, I just didn't realize how steep and for how long until I was already knee deep into it. But since this is my TT bike, I have been thinking of getting a second rear wheel with different gearing specifically for hilly routes like this. Some of these grades reminded me quite a bit of the Santa Barbara tri I did last fall, where I walked on that one too. But for a different reason at that time. I was using my Roubiax on that, and it has plenty of low gear for the inclines.
#7
velo-dilettante
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,339
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1630 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times
in
1,692 Posts
if you've done it, you know the "loop" ain't no joke with that first 4-5 miles consistently uphill at a decent clip. those first few miles are plenty to dissuade/demoralize cyclists that don't like suffering/climbing, aren't in shape for it or just don't have the legs that day. if you haven't done it, you should. super scenic with some great curves/stretches on the (mostly) flat/downhill, last ten miles. fwiw, hit 11.4% grade on the initial/main climb at the start. there's a small 13.6% and an 18.9% double slap on the second half as well. also, fwiw, find strava a bit more accurate than ridewithgps altho neither is perfect. having done it, no way in hades it maxes at 9.4%. this is coming from a guy that has actively sought out/still seeks ugly, double-digit grades.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
Last edited by diphthong; 05-05-23 at 11:11 PM.
Likes For diphthong:
#8
velo-dilettante
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,339
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1630 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times
in
1,692 Posts
Once again, I had to go in to Vegas today so I took a bike. I took the Ridley TT bike because I'm trying to get used to that bike for my triathlons. Anyway, I've ridden highway 159 (Red Rock Canyon Rd) a couple dozen times. I have a solid 30 mile route mapped out that had some good ups and down.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubiax out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubiax out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
if you've done it, you know the "loop" ain't no joke with that first 4-5 miles consistently uphill at a decent clip. those first few miles are plenty to dissuade/demoralize cyclists that don't like suffering/climbing, aren't in shape for it or just don't have the legs that day. if you haven't done it, you should. super scenic with some great curves/stretches on the (mostly) flat/downhill, last ten miles. fwiw, hit 11.4% grade on the initial/main climb at the start. there's a small 13.6% and an 18.9% double slap on the second half as well. also, fwiw, find strava a bit more accurate than ridewithgps altho neither is perfect. having done it, no way in hades it maxes at 9.4%. this is coming from a guy that has actively sought out/still seeks ugly, double-digit grades.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
Likes For VegasJen:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,307
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1144 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
690 Posts
See, there's this thing called the internet. https://ridewithgps.com/routes/20471302
Looks like the section you're talking about averages about a 3.6% grade with a max of 9.4%.
Looks like the section you're talking about averages about a 3.6% grade with a max of 9.4%.
Likes For spelger:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,307
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1144 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
690 Posts
if you've done it, you know the "loop" ain't no joke with that first 4-5 miles consistently uphill at a decent clip. those first few miles are plenty to dissuade/demoralize cyclists that don't like suffering/climbing, aren't in shape for it or just don't have the legs that day. if you haven't done it, you should. super scenic with some great curves/stretches on the (mostly) flat/downhill, last ten miles. fwiw, hit 11.4% grade on the initial/main climb at the start. there's a small 13.6% and an 18.9% double slap on the second half as well. also, fwiw, find strava a bit more accurate than ridewithgps altho neither is perfect. having done it, no way in hades it maxes at 9.4%. this is coming from a guy that has actively sought out/still seeks ugly, double-digit grades.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
https://www.strava.com/activities/60...63465362185392
tt bike is not the bike for that particular course.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,383 Times
in
2,971 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#13
velo-dilettante
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,339
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1630 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times
in
1,692 Posts
you'll be fine with the bike change. definitely not leisurely but doable on a non-tt bike with decent gearing for hills. you'll want at least a 34-27 combo to negotiate. save the tt bike for hitting the west side of lake mead.
#14
Senior Member
What's needed is an adequate low gear, not more chain rings. Triple cranks aren't common these days. I really like having a bike computer that tells me the grade of the road I'm climbing. I have grades in the 12-16% range, so I have a 46/30 crank and 10-36 12 speed cassette. The 30/36 does get used for seated climbing of the steepest sections. I use my big ring on grades up to 8%, if they're not too long. A 46/28 works for out of the saddle climbing.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3244 Post(s)
Liked 2,523 Times
in
1,516 Posts
I got humbled yesterday as well. I was driving down the road and "I Don't Need No Doctor" came on the radio. I turned it up and let er rip.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7033 Post(s)
Liked 11,068 Times
in
4,729 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,115
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 824 Post(s)
Liked 1,966 Times
in
948 Posts
When I figured out I can "rest" while still climbing with recovery, hills became a whole lot easier.
Good advice above about getting a proper climbing cassette like a 34 or 36 tooth cog so you can rest and recover then press on while still assaulting a long grade.
Find your cadence and gearing that keeps you out of the red.
Good advice above about getting a proper climbing cassette like a 34 or 36 tooth cog so you can rest and recover then press on while still assaulting a long grade.
Find your cadence and gearing that keeps you out of the red.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,307
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1144 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
690 Posts
no, reality is not insulting. but you are picking and choosing your reality. there are two links to that route in this thread. granted, you posted prior to the second's addition. the two sources show differing grades. and the second is backed up by someone who has done it. apparently not as easy as assumed. see post #7.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,383 Times
in
2,971 Posts
no, reality is not insulting. but you are picking and choosing your reality. there are two links to that route in this thread. granted, you posted prior to the second's addition. the two sources show differing grades. and the second is backed up by someone who has done it. apparently not as easy as assumed. see post #7.
This 4.4 mile bike climb is located in NV, USA. The average gradient is 4.6% and there is a total elevation gain of 1,111 ft, finishing at 4,773 ft.
This climb averages 4.6%. The steepest quarter mile of this climb is 8.3% and steepest continuous mile is 7.4%. 0 miles of the climb is at or above 10% grade. The gradient on this climb is broken down as follows: 0.3 miles (7.6%) of descent; 1.7 miles (39.1%) at 0-5% grade; 2.3 miles (53.2%) at 5-10% grade
This climb averages 4.6%. The steepest quarter mile of this climb is 8.3% and steepest continuous mile is 7.4%. 0 miles of the climb is at or above 10% grade. The gradient on this climb is broken down as follows: 0.3 miles (7.6%) of descent; 1.7 miles (39.1%) at 0-5% grade; 2.3 miles (53.2%) at 5-10% grade
Likes For tomato coupe:
#20
Full Member
Once again, I had to go in to Vegas today so I took a bike. I took the Ridley TT bike because I'm trying to get used to that bike for my triathlons. Anyway, I've ridden highway 159 (Red Rock Canyon Rd) a couple dozen times. I have a solid 30 mile route mapped out that had some good ups and down.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubaix out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
Today, I thought I would try something different and rode the Red Rock Scenic Loop. Now, I've been through the scenic loop before, but by vehicle. Of course, the deceptive thing about being in a car is you don't quite get an appreciation for just how long and steep hills can be. After the entry gate at the loop it's 4.5 miles, almost entirely uphill. My map program shows a lot of 7-8% grade but there are a couple sections that are 12%. I hate to admit it, but I walked almost the last mile to the top. It was so long and steep. Just relentless. I hate walking. It's like admitting defeat. And at that point, I was defeated.
I think some of it is that the Ridley is just the wrong tool for that job. Because it is a TT bike, I only have two gears on the chain ring. I really could have used that extra low gear. Having said that, the reality is I'm just not as strong as I want to think I am. Especially going up a steep hill, carrying some extra weight sure isn't doing me any favors either.
Just for comparison, I might take my Roubaix out there next week and see if that extra gearing makes as much difference as I'm hoping.
#21
Full Member
#22
Full Member
What's needed is an adequate low gear, not more chain rings. Triple cranks aren't common these days. I really like having a bike computer that tells me the grade of the road I'm climbing. I have grades in the 12-16% range, so I have a 46/30 crank and 10-36 12 speed cassette. The 30/36 does get used for seated climbing of the steepest sections. I use my big ring on grades up to 8%, if they're not too long. A 46/28 works for out of the saddle climbing.
#23
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,604
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 547 Post(s)
Liked 1,895 Times
in
851 Posts
Back when I raced, we'd change out freewheels prior to an event depending on the course. Criteriums got the straight-block, while steep road races would use freewheels with insanely huge cogs as (gasp!) 24 teeth. Gearing choices are much saner now, and swapping out a cassette is even easier than swapping a freewheel, as long as you have the lockring tool and a chain whip. Just make sure the derailleurs and chain can handle the largest front / rear sprocket combination.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#24
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,606
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times
in
398 Posts
Happens to a lot of us. We think we are pretty good at it, until we enter a race.
Likes For Reynolds:
#25
NotaNewbie
Up up up
I find a 10% grade incredibly difficult after miles of 6-8% grade. Especially if you double down and hit the lesser grade hard not knowing what is ahead. On the other hand after doing the Tram Road at Palm Springs many times and knowing it well, it is a pleasure to suffer up. Great job Op, keep on keepin’ on!
Likes For Jimriides: