New Tiagra or old Dura Ace???
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
New Tiagra or old Dura Ace???
Hi all. So, I'm considering building a new road bike off an older Bianchi frame. I'm so jazzed about a bar end friction shifter that I put on a different 9-speed (Sora) that I'm considering putting the same setup on the new build, but as a 10-speed. Or maybe I'll go with another 9, I don't know yet. So my question is this: what setup will give the smoother shifting performance? A modern Tiagra or an older Dura Ace RD7800? Or even an older Ultegra (I think RD 6800 series.) I see the older rear derailleurs all over eBay for reasonable prices. But I don't want to get an older mechanism just for the "retro" effect. I want it to work well. If a modern derailleur that is "lower" in the Shimano hierarchy will perform better than an older higher-end mech, then I want the better-performing mech. What are your thoughts? Thanks!
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
If you get the new Tiagra, then more of it will be compatible if you ever decide to go to 11 speed. I don't know if it's better than the older DuraAce, but my son's bike came with Tiagra and it shifted very nicely with fast shifts. I didn't think it any worse than my 105 5800. Although the rim brakes seemed a little less beefier than the 105 rim brakes. But they worked well and I didn't notice a functional difference in their stopping power.
If nothing else, you'll have new stuff on it if you get new Tiagra. And new is a plus to me.
If nothing else, you'll have new stuff on it if you get new Tiagra. And new is a plus to me.
#3
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,118
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,437 Times
in
819 Posts
I like modern components on classic frame sets. If I was doing this, I would be getting the 11 speed 105 7000. Just me, but I would not have a problem with buying a 4700 Tiagra group, but I would not buy it to later upgrade it to 11 speed in the future. I have had used 4400, 4500, and am now using 4600 shifters with a 6600 group. They have all been very good for lower tier components.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
I'm not concerned about upgrading in the future. Whatever speed I select is the speed it will remain. Also, since I want to fit it with a bar end friction shifter, I think I'll want the cassette no wider than a 10. But that raises a question in my unknowing mind: does it even matter how many cogs the cassette has if I use the shifter in friction mode? As an inquiry, will a Shimano Dura Ace SL-BS77 fit for a 9-speed work with a 10-12 cassette in friction mode? Thanks!
#5
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
New 10-speed Shimano sets are already hard to come by.
Likes For terrymorse:
#6
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
In what world is Ultegra 6800 considered 'retro'?
Likes For mstateglfr:
#7
Senior Member
Anything not 12 speed is cheap stuff or retro. 12 speed has been out for 5 years for Campy and SRAM. I had early model Chorus 12, but switched to Force electronic about a year later. No regrets with trouble free service on 3 bikes.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,951
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,300 Times
in
2,948 Posts
#10
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
you forgot the sarcasterisks at the end of this comical statement.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,961 Times
in
944 Posts
Hi all. So, I'm considering building a new road bike off an older Bianchi frame. I'm so jazzed about a bar end friction shifter that I put on a different 9-speed (Sora) that I'm considering putting the same setup on the new build, but as a 10-speed. Or maybe I'll go with another 9, I don't know yet. So my question is this: what setup will give the smoother shifting performance? A modern Tiagra or an older Dura Ace RD7800? Or even an older Ultegra (I think RD 6800 series.) I see the older rear derailleurs all over eBay for reasonable prices. But I don't want to get an older mechanism just for the "retro" effect. I want it to work well. If a modern derailleur that is "lower" in the Shimano hierarchy will perform better than an older higher-end mech, then I want the better-performing mech. What are your thoughts? Thanks!
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,114
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times
in
440 Posts
We're off topic here, but I unfortunately cannot share your appreciation of the Force AXS groupset. I absolutely hated it. Slow shifting, low battery life, frequent front derailleur chain drops. Shimano is much nicer and fancier IMO.
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
Thanks for the replies. For specificity, I placed the word "retro" in quotes. Just trying to give the idea in my original post that I'm not interested in buying older parts just for the sake of building something time-period specific. I also see that I mistakenly referenced an Ultegra RD 6800 (again, preferences with an "I think", when I should have stated 6500. But alas, I still don't see any opinions as to whether an older Dra Ace or Ultegra 10 speed will shift more smoothly/perform better than a modern Tiagra.
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hopefully I am in a position to answer your question mostly. I currently have a bike with new generation Tiagra, my trainer bike. I have a time trial bike with Ultegra 6700, a road bike with Dura Ace 7900, a road bike with Ultegra 6800, and a cyclocross bike with 105 5800. I previously had a bike with Dura-Ace 7700 for many years. I know, I have way too many bikes. I won't even get into my mountain bikes.
As far as shifting the Ultegra 6800 and 105 5800 groups are almost identical with possibly a slight edge to 6800 but that may even be in my head and due also to the different uses the bikes see.They are both excellent groups and the best I have personally owned. This may sound crazy but the newest generation Tiagra is basically a match for those two groups. The Ultegra 6700 is good but hard to compare because on a time trial bike it has bar end shifters and in my experience those tend to shift very well what ever group. Ironically my worst shifting group is my Dura Ace 7900. Not horrible but honestly has always disappointing especially compared to Dura Ace 7700. Dura Ace 7900 has always been recognized as the worst generation of Dura-Ace. I have no experience with Dura Ace 7800 as I skipped that generation but I have always heard that it was an excellent group
Maybe more information then you needed but I hoped to answer what you were really asking.
With all that being said unless you think you are going to get upgrade fever quickly I would buy a new Tiagra group. For the money I think it would be awfully hard to beat and parts are still readily available as opposed to an older group. One thing to be aware of I believe that Tiagra is not backwards or forwards compatible with any Shimano group at least from what I understand so you will not be able to mix any other group with it. Someone may correct me on this.
Hope that helps.
As far as shifting the Ultegra 6800 and 105 5800 groups are almost identical with possibly a slight edge to 6800 but that may even be in my head and due also to the different uses the bikes see.They are both excellent groups and the best I have personally owned. This may sound crazy but the newest generation Tiagra is basically a match for those two groups. The Ultegra 6700 is good but hard to compare because on a time trial bike it has bar end shifters and in my experience those tend to shift very well what ever group. Ironically my worst shifting group is my Dura Ace 7900. Not horrible but honestly has always disappointing especially compared to Dura Ace 7700. Dura Ace 7900 has always been recognized as the worst generation of Dura-Ace. I have no experience with Dura Ace 7800 as I skipped that generation but I have always heard that it was an excellent group
Maybe more information then you needed but I hoped to answer what you were really asking.
With all that being said unless you think you are going to get upgrade fever quickly I would buy a new Tiagra group. For the money I think it would be awfully hard to beat and parts are still readily available as opposed to an older group. One thing to be aware of I believe that Tiagra is not backwards or forwards compatible with any Shimano group at least from what I understand so you will not be able to mix any other group with it. Someone may correct me on this.
Hope that helps.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,098
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1400 Post(s)
Liked 1,885 Times
in
1,084 Posts
Shimano Tiagra 4700 series and GRX 400 10 speed are sorta / kinda odd balls - they use the same pull ratio as the Shimano 11 speed road groups - and therefore are not compatible with older Shimano 10 speed groups
#17
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
#18
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
Thanks Cervelo. I envy your bike collection. I saw last night that there's a 105 10 speed (RD 5701.) I think I'll just jump into that. Jenson's has them for $50. If it's anything like my RD7000 derailleur, then it will be more than sufficient for my needs.
#21
Senior Member
Another difference is that the RD-R7000 uses the newer actuation ratio, Shimano 11 speed spec., so it needs more cable pull between gears. The RD-5701 is the older Shimano 10 speed actuation ratio the same as your Sora. As stated earlier, the Tiagra 4700 series used the newer ratio.
In friction mode, the older actuation ratio will need less cable pull, and thus require more precision when shifting. The 'newer' actuation ratio uses more cable pull, so more shifter movement is needed, this means less precision is needed, (this assumes that the shifter has enough total pull to 'cover' the whole width of the cassette.
#22
Newbie
Great insight! - Trickle down tech is real. I only recently started road cycling - bought second hand bikes for myself and my two kids in a variety of years and models. I already swapped from a 2012 tarmac with 105 to a 2007 model Kuota with Dura Ace 7800 10s - one kid got a 2019 model year bike with Tiagra - another a 2017 Dolce with Sora. I also have a beat up Felt with 105 10speed.
To the Point:
15+ year old Dura Ace 7800 feels the smoothest to me - shifting is effortless. But the components are older and I had to do some pretty comprehensive cleaning/maintenance to get them into top shape. That a 15+ year old groupset shows little to no signs of stress in the plastics or corrosion in the metal is a testament to build quality. That said, I do have my questions as to just how long it will continue to perform at a high level before springs wear out and things start breaking.
10+ year old 105 is really not very far behind - both 105 groupsets I rode on were/are over 10 years old and run super smooth - zero complaints from me on them. If anything, it feels like i might need to correct indexing a tad more frequently with them,but there are a TON of variables that could be affect that which are unrelated to model differences even if they are 2 steps below Dura Ace in the hierarchy.
4 year Tiagra is def a step down in smoothness - While still nice to ride on, this 4 year old version def felt a bit "clunkier" - noisier shifts under load (downshifting while in a climb), and the throw (how far you have to push the level to change gears) feels a tad longer.
I dont know when Shimano last updated their Tiagra Groupsets - if it was in the past 4 years, then Im sure they are much better now.
TLDR - the old Dura Ace are badass group sets, but they are OLD and long term reliability if you're installing now is worth considering - if you do go that route, taking the time to find one in top condition would be something I'd personally prioritize. Can't speak for the current Tiagra, but the one from 4 years ago def felt like a downgrade from my old dura ace 7800. But older 105s in good condition are pretty damn good, and I've heard that the current 105 groupset is barely a compromise at all...
To the Point:
15+ year old Dura Ace 7800 feels the smoothest to me - shifting is effortless. But the components are older and I had to do some pretty comprehensive cleaning/maintenance to get them into top shape. That a 15+ year old groupset shows little to no signs of stress in the plastics or corrosion in the metal is a testament to build quality. That said, I do have my questions as to just how long it will continue to perform at a high level before springs wear out and things start breaking.
10+ year old 105 is really not very far behind - both 105 groupsets I rode on were/are over 10 years old and run super smooth - zero complaints from me on them. If anything, it feels like i might need to correct indexing a tad more frequently with them,but there are a TON of variables that could be affect that which are unrelated to model differences even if they are 2 steps below Dura Ace in the hierarchy.
4 year Tiagra is def a step down in smoothness - While still nice to ride on, this 4 year old version def felt a bit "clunkier" - noisier shifts under load (downshifting while in a climb), and the throw (how far you have to push the level to change gears) feels a tad longer.
I dont know when Shimano last updated their Tiagra Groupsets - if it was in the past 4 years, then Im sure they are much better now.
TLDR - the old Dura Ace are badass group sets, but they are OLD and long term reliability if you're installing now is worth considering - if you do go that route, taking the time to find one in top condition would be something I'd personally prioritize. Can't speak for the current Tiagra, but the one from 4 years ago def felt like a downgrade from my old dura ace 7800. But older 105s in good condition are pretty damn good, and I've heard that the current 105 groupset is barely a compromise at all...
#23
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
[QUOTE=KCT1986;23157678]The RD-5701 is an older style RD, while the RD-R7000 is the newer 'Shadow' design, (if that matters).
Another difference is that the RD-R7000 uses the newer actuation ratio, Shimano 11 speed spec., so it needs more cable pull between gears. The RD-5701 is the older Shimano 10 speed actuation ratio the same as your Sora. As stated earlier, the Tiagra 4700 series used the newer ratio.
So, based upon that, it would seem that the Tiagra will be easier to shift using friction than the older 105 RD-5701. Would that be your Opinion? Thank you!
Another difference is that the RD-R7000 uses the newer actuation ratio, Shimano 11 speed spec., so it needs more cable pull between gears. The RD-5701 is the older Shimano 10 speed actuation ratio the same as your Sora. As stated earlier, the Tiagra 4700 series used the newer ratio.
So, based upon that, it would seem that the Tiagra will be easier to shift using friction than the older 105 RD-5701. Would that be your Opinion? Thank you!
#24
Senior Member
[QUOTE=ArgoMan;23157931]
Since the Tiagra RD-4700 (& 11 speed Shimano road RD) needs more cable pull, it would be less likely that you would 'overshift' the gear that you are desiring (in friction mode).
As the # of gears go up in the cassette, the sprockets are closer together. This means that you need a more precise 'feel' in your hands to get it accurate.
Since the older RD (like the 5701 and most road 10 speed & under) has a higher actuation ratio, less cable pull is needed. This means that your leeway in 'feel' is reduced.
In you first post, you mentioned friction shifting a 9 speed Sora (which has the higher actuation ratio). The 5701 has the same ratio. If this is on a 9 speed cassette, then expect that a 10 speed cassette will require a little more 'feel' to get right since the sprockets are closer together. This assumes that the shifter uses the same size 'cable take-up' spool. The larger the 'spool', the more cable it will pull per degree of shifter movement.
This post just addresses the difference in the RD's cable pull difference, not the build quality of the RD.
The RD-5701 is an older style RD, while the RD-R7000 is the newer 'Shadow' design, (if that matters).
Another difference is that the RD-R7000 uses the newer actuation ratio, Shimano 11 speed spec., so it needs more cable pull between gears. The RD-5701 is the older Shimano 10 speed actuation ratio the same as your Sora. As stated earlier, the Tiagra 4700 series used the newer ratio.
So, based upon that, it would seem that the Tiagra will be easier to shift using friction than the older 105 RD-5701. Would that be your Opinion? Thank you!
Another difference is that the RD-R7000 uses the newer actuation ratio, Shimano 11 speed spec., so it needs more cable pull between gears. The RD-5701 is the older Shimano 10 speed actuation ratio the same as your Sora. As stated earlier, the Tiagra 4700 series used the newer ratio.
So, based upon that, it would seem that the Tiagra will be easier to shift using friction than the older 105 RD-5701. Would that be your Opinion? Thank you!
As the # of gears go up in the cassette, the sprockets are closer together. This means that you need a more precise 'feel' in your hands to get it accurate.
Since the older RD (like the 5701 and most road 10 speed & under) has a higher actuation ratio, less cable pull is needed. This means that your leeway in 'feel' is reduced.
In you first post, you mentioned friction shifting a 9 speed Sora (which has the higher actuation ratio). The 5701 has the same ratio. If this is on a 9 speed cassette, then expect that a 10 speed cassette will require a little more 'feel' to get right since the sprockets are closer together. This assumes that the shifter uses the same size 'cable take-up' spool. The larger the 'spool', the more cable it will pull per degree of shifter movement.
This post just addresses the difference in the RD's cable pull difference, not the build quality of the RD.
#25
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
[QUOTE=KCT1986;23158042]
Thank you, that really clarifies things. I practically had zero adjustment time to get the feel of my bar end shifter in friction mode. It came very naturally for me. That's with a 9-speed. So, I'm thinking that I should be okay with a 10-speed.
Now, onto build quality. I have the Sora and the 105 (RD7000.) The 105 is all metal, where the Sora has plastic parts. My son has a new Tiagra set up with his bike, and it too incorporates a bit of plastic. I just have to assume that the 105 is a much better built mech.
Now, onto build quality. I have the Sora and the 105 (RD7000.) The 105 is all metal, where the Sora has plastic parts. My son has a new Tiagra set up with his bike, and it too incorporates a bit of plastic. I just have to assume that the 105 is a much better built mech.
Likes For ArgoMan: