Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

My brand new Brooks is... painful.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

My brand new Brooks is... painful.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-17, 10:53 AM
  #1  
corrado33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My brand new Brooks is... painful.

It's been a week since I've started using my new B-17 narrow on my commuter bike. (I have very... very skinny sit bones.) Today I gave in, and had to ride one of my other bikes. The Brooks is literally PAINFUL to ride. I decided to try a Brooks because for the last 4 years I've ridden with a normal saddle with a gel saddle pad on it to prevent saddle sores on the 4 mile commute (too short to wear a chamois or real biking gear.) So I said "well, these saddles are supposed to be great, even without a chamois, so I'll give them a shot." Yes, the gel saddle pad PREVENTED saddle sores. I've done many experiments with and without the pad, without the pad I get saddle sores, with the pad I don't.

Is this normal? I've decided I'll give it a month riding it as much as I can possibly stand. But honestly, this is the least comfortable saddle I've ever ridden. Other saddles (even thin "hard" ones) aren't "painful" but they will give me saddle sores after a few days of riding without a chamois. (Say, on a commuter.) It's painful directly ON my sit bones. Nowhere else. It feels like I've trying to dig my sit bones into a granite countertop with all my weight on it.

It's not the positioning of the saddle, it's the stiffness. The saddle is tilted up more than normal saddles, like people typically do with brooks saddles. That's perfectly fine.

I debated trying to loosen the tension on the leather in the front, but it's already at the end of it's range (I can't make it any looser from how it was shipped to me.) How long do these things take to wear in?

The bike I'm riding it on has a very small saddle to bar drop (and it's a flat bar commuter).

I just don't know how much I can force myself to ride this bike. It's quite... miserable currently. I already applied the proofhide, so I'd imagine applying neatsfoot oil would be hard at this point.

Any advice?
corrado33 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:07 AM
  #2  
lostarchitect 
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,970

Bikes: See sig

Liked 57 Times in 40 Posts
If it's not for you, it's not for you--and they're not for everyone. That said, I find that leather saddles I love can be hellish when not adjusted quite right. You say it's not the adjustment, but it may be. It also may be that even though you have narrow sit bones, the B-17N might be too narrow and you might be better suited to a Professional. It's just pretty much impossible to diagnose from here...
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:09 AM
  #3  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,711

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Liked 2,327 Times in 1,162 Posts
How long is your commute?

When I purchased my Colnago, it came with a Flite TI. I thought a saddle was a saddle and rode it. I soon found that I could not be on it for more than 30 miles. I went back to my then 30 year old Brooks Pro. Don't know how long I can ride it.

When I moved to DC, I picked up a Pinarello with a Flute TI. I knew 12 miles was acceptable so left it on.

Now after almost 4300 miles on the Flite, it is fine for the commute. I have acquired a number of additional Brooks Pro's and a Swift. I don't know about the swift yet but the others work just fine for my back side.

There are two break ins that need to occur to get to a comfort level, the saddle and the other part that sits on it. It takes time depending on what you were acclimated to. Some say a Pro needs 300 miles to be broken in. I don't know what the B17 needs. My understanding is that since the leather is thinner, less miles.

Bottom line, so to speak, if it isn't working after this time period, I question if it will work at all.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:09 AM
  #4  
sloar 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,574

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Liked 1,381 Times in 494 Posts
Takes around 500 miles to break in. They can be a little uncomfortable at first, but once they are broke in they are pretty nice. But every butt is different, I'd give it a little more time.
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is online now  
Old 08-02-17, 11:17 AM
  #5  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,811

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Liked 578 Times in 343 Posts
Sorry to hear about your discomfort!

I suspect it's a matter of riding style to some degree; there is so little comparison between a gel saddle and a hard leather saddle that I don't think one really sits on them quite the same way. I'm putting this badly. Maybe someone more articulate than I will try to explain.

If you want to try extreme measures, here's what you do. 1, make the saddle wet. How wet, that's debatable. Some people put a wet washcloth over it for a few hours; others dunk it into water for a minute or less, then let it sit for an hour or three. Don't make it sopping wet, just let it soak up some water. Let the water soak in, so it doesn't look wet. This will soften it temporarily. 2, go for a short ride. Just enough that you can see the shape of the saddle starting to change. As soon as you see any change, stop. 3, let it dry. Give it a day or two.
After you've done that, reassess the situation. The process described will adjust the saddle to your anatomy. You can repeat it as many times as necessary, but it is hard to undo the changes, so I recommend taking it easy, give it a week or two between treatments.

Good luck!
rhm is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:19 AM
  #6  
corrado33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
If it's not for you, it's not for you--and they're not for everyone. That said, I find that leather saddles I love can be hellish when not adjusted quite right. You say it's not the adjustment, but it may be. It also may be that even though you have narrow sit bones, the B-17N might be too narrow and you might be better suited to a Professional. It's just pretty much impossible to diagnose from here...
The B-17N is 15-20 mm wider than most normal saddles I ride. The last time I measured them (years... and years ago) I did the typical "measure them and add a bit per side to get your saddle size" and my saddle size came out to be ~120-125mm, much narrower than saddles are manufactured. On my road bikes, I ride the Fizik Arione, specified at 132mm. It's one of the thinnest saddles I could find.

If the B-17 N is too narrow for me... I'm not sure who it would be built for...

I'm also not sure how I could adjust it to make it more comfortable? Tilt it forward?
corrado33 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:22 AM
  #7  
squirtdad 
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 10,390

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Liked 3,490 Times in 1,825 Posts
my experience is that a B-17 works for me as long as I am pretty upright.

A b-17 narrow imperial (with the cut) did not work for me at all

The Swift works great and in road position with some drop from saddle to bar (not to much....to old for extreme )

in looking at saddles what I think makes the difference form is not just width, but have.... my old go to saddle that I still run on one my bikes was the orignal sella italia turbo. it has a bit of a rounded top at the back. The swift is similar, but the b17-narrow was way more flat

good luck
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.





squirtdad is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:23 AM
  #8  
corrado33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Sorry to hear about your discomfort!

I suspect it's a matter of riding style to some degree; there is so little comparison between a gel saddle and a hard leather saddle that I don't think one really sits on them quite the same way. I'm putting this badly. Maybe someone more articulate than I will try to explain.

If you want to try extreme measures, here's what you do. 1, make the saddle wet. How wet, that's debatable. Some people put a wet washcloth over it for a few hours; others dunk it into water for a minute or less, then let it sit for an hour or three. Don't make it sopping wet, just let it soak up some water. Let the water soak in, so it doesn't look wet. This will soften it temporarily. 2, go for a short ride. Just enough that you can see the shape of the saddle starting to change. As soon as you see any change, stop. 3, let it dry. Give it a day or two.
After you've done that, reassess the situation. The process described will adjust the saddle to your anatomy. You can repeat it as many times as necessary, but it is hard to undo the changes, so I recommend taking it easy, give it a week or two between treatments.

Good luck!
Thanks for the advice! I was hoping you'd comment. I'm not sure if I want to go the water route yet. The saddle is brand new, and if I don't like it, I'd like to be able to sell it while still claiming that it's as "good as new." I don't know if I could do that in good conscience after doing the water treatment.

I'll try to give it a month. If there is no change in comfort by the end of the month then I'll have to sell it or try something more drastic.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:25 AM
  #9  
Pistard
Senior Member
 
Pistard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Columbia county, NY
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
My grandfather had one in the 1920's. better technology out there over the last 100 Years
Pistard is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:37 AM
  #10  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,670

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Liked 2,600 Times in 1,593 Posts
I'm of the mind that a saddle should at least be tolerable from the get-go. Yes, a brand-new Brooks is hard, but if adjusted correctly, it should be no worse than sitting on the corner of a wooden table. Severe pain and/or numbness haven't gone away with 300-1000 miles of break-in, in my experience.

Despite the nominally wider aft end, a Pro might be a better fit for your narrow sit bones, as the top shape is a little more rounded and the center section seems narrower than a B17N.

Or the Fizik Arione might just be better for your anatomy.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:37 AM
  #11  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,711

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Liked 2,327 Times in 1,162 Posts
Originally Posted by Pistard
My grandfather had one in the 1920's. better technology out there over the last 100 Years
Yeah, butt there still is a high demand for leather for a number of products despite the technology "advancements".
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:43 AM
  #12  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Liked 644 Times in 361 Posts
It might be too wide. You said you have very skinny sit bones, [MENTION=345109]corrado33[/MENTION]. Is your old gel saddle noticeably narrower?

I've been noticing my B17s and my B17-width RHM saddle are all seeming to wide for me, these days. Not enough to get rid of them, they just don't seem to disappear right away like the Pros and (gasp) Unicanitors do.

I'm with [MENTION=251447]ThermionicScott[/MENTION], a saddle should be at the very least tolerable from the get-go. This is assuming you're a regular rider who does significant miles. And also, that slightly rounded up section towards the back is pretty much a must-have for me. The B17s all seem to start fairly firm back there, then flatten out more than I'd like. Once I start to sink into them, it's not so good anymore.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●


Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 08-02-17 at 11:50 AM.
Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:44 AM
  #13  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,544
Liked 7,745 Times in 2,875 Posts
If you get saddle sores from a 4-mile commute if you don't have padding, your physiology/anatomy is unique and likely requires something more specialized.
nlerner is online now  
Old 08-02-17, 11:48 AM
  #14  
bargainguy 
Senior Member
 
bargainguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Trekland
Posts: 2,311
Liked 367 Times in 222 Posts
A couple ideas on accelerating the break-in on your Brooks here:

Breaking in a Leather Saddle (quickly) | Rando Richard
bargainguy is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:51 AM
  #15  
TugaDude
Senior Member
 
TugaDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,503
Liked 612 Times in 447 Posts
Originally Posted by SJX426
How long is your commute?

When I purchased my Colnago, it came with a Flite TI. I thought a saddle was a saddle and rode it. I soon found that I could not be on it for more than 30 miles. I went back to my then 30 year old Brooks Pro. Don't know how long I can ride it.

When I moved to DC, I picked up a Pinarello with a Flute TI. I knew 12 miles was acceptable so left it on.

Now after almost 4300 miles on the Flite, it is fine for the commute. I have acquired a number of additional Brooks Pro's and a Swift. I don't know about the swift yet but the others work just fine for my back side.

There are two break ins that need to occur to get to a comfort level, the saddle and the other part that sits on it. It takes time depending on what you were acclimated to. Some say a Pro needs 300 miles to be broken in. I don't know what the B17 needs. My understanding is that since the leather is thinner, less miles.

Bottom line, so to speak, if it isn't working after this time period, I question if it will work at all.
OP says 4 mile commute. Not very far to be getting saddle sores. I ride mostly Brooks, both B17 and Professional models and so long as they are set up at the proper angle (for me) they feel great.
TugaDude is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:53 AM
  #16  
Falcon3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: E Wa
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Don't throw in the towel yet on Brooks. I freaking hate the B17N I rode 10 miles on one and spent the last 5 pedaling out of the saddle cause it was so painful. However, my B17 is like butter and I can ride as far as my legs will handle on it.

You might also look into the Brooks Cambium models. I have a C17 and it's amazingly comfortable too, and weatherproof, so you don't have to worry about getting the saddle wet.
Falcon3 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 11:54 AM
  #17  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Liked 601 Times in 433 Posts
I'd try setting it level. An up nose position works for some people, but it will tend to put more pressure on your sit bones IME. It's a bit counterintuitive.

If you're actually getting saddle sores - as in red boils or welts, try some aloe vera. Old school but does wonders.
Salamandrine is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Kevindale
Senior Member
 
Kevindale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,662

Bikes: 1980 Koga-Miyata Gentsluxe-S, 1998 Eddy Merckx Corsa 01, 1983 Tommasini Racing, 2012 Gulf Western CAAD10, 1980 Univega Gran Premio

Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
Thanks for the advice! I was hoping you'd comment. I'm not sure if I want to go the water route yet. The saddle is brand new, and if I don't like it, I'd like to be able to sell it while still claiming that it's as "good as new." I don't know if I could do that in good conscience after doing the water treatment.

I'll try to give it a month. If there is no change in comfort by the end of the month then I'll have to sell it or try something more drastic.
Let me know if you need to sell it along. I just did a longer ride (only 26 miles) on my new old B17, and while my sitz bones have never been better, I'm sore where the edge/side of the saddle pushed into my inner thigh. I figured I'd try a B17 narrow next, and then a Pro if that seems too narrow.
Kevindale is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 12:25 PM
  #19  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,670

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Liked 2,600 Times in 1,593 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevindale
Let me know if you need to sell it along. I just did a longer ride (only 26 miles) on my new old B17, and while my sitz bones have never been better, I'm sore where the edge/side of the saddle pushed into my inner thigh. I figured I'd try a B17 narrow next, and then a Pro if that seems too narrow.
Similar to my progression. I started with a couple of B17's, noticed that they chafed my inner thighs on longer rides, so I tried a Pro. It was a bit too narrow and rounded, so I got a B17N on one bike and a B5N (almost the same dimensions) on another and they are doing the trick.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 12:28 PM
  #20  
cdmurphy
Senior Member
 
cdmurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 550

Bikes: Too many, but sometimes not enough.

Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
I'm of the mind that a saddle should at least be tolerable from the get-go. Yes, a brand-new Brooks is hard, but if adjusted correctly, it should be no worse than sitting on the corner of a wooden table. Severe pain and/or numbness haven't gone away with 300-1000 miles of break-in, in my experience.

Despite the nominally wider aft end, a Pro might be a better fit for your narrow sit bones, as the top shape is a little more rounded and the center section seems narrower than a B17N.

Or the Fizik Arione might just be better for your anatomy.
+1 to this. I find my backside needs a more rounded saddle top. Brooks Pros, and Ideale 90s fit the bill, and are comfortable from the get go, even when very hard and stiff. I've tried a few Fujita belt saddles, which are closely patterned after the B17. They have a flatter rear section, and a sharper transition from the sides to the top. I dutifully put in a few hundred miles on them, to no avail. Always felt like my sitbones were sitting on a corner of the saddle, rather than supported by it. From looking at the relatively wider width of the Fujita, I think it was extending past the sit bones, and digging into the flesh just past them, with painful results.

If your B17 narrow is painful now, I don't think it's going to get much better. Usually, a good fitting leather saddle will go from good, to great. Not horrible to good or great.

One last point - it seems Brooks changed the width and shape of the Pro some time in the 80s. I like the slightly narrower, more rounded earlier version. Modern production ones seem to flare too much at the back, with a flatter rear profile. They're ok for 20-30 miles, but not much more for me. The older ones fit me like a glove.
cdmurphy is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 01:09 PM
  #21  
lostarchitect 
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,970

Bikes: See sig

Liked 57 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
If the B-17 N is too narrow for me... I'm not sure who it would be built for...

I'm also not sure how I could adjust it to make it more comfortable? Tilt it forward?
Yeah, like I said, tough to diagnose from here. But it's not all about width in terms of the numbers, the shapes of the saddles are different too. If you want to try a thinner one, there are some vintage saddles that are smaller. RHM may have one or two that he has recovered?

As far as adjustment, any direction may make a difference. Some people like leather saddles lower or higher than other saddles. Most (but not all) like the nose tilted a bit up, but the degree varies a lot. You may also find that you want it farther back or forward. This is all generic info, I know, but, again, tough to know what is going on from here.

But all that said, I also think I agree with ThermonicScott: if it's not at least ok at first, it probably isn't for you.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 01:10 PM
  #22  
corrado33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
If you get saddle sores from a 4-mile commute if you don't have padding, your physiology/anatomy is unique and likely requires something more specialized.
Unfortunately, I think you're right. I've always had somewhat "finicky" skin. It's very dry and I tend to develop saddle sores faster than most people unfortunately. The skin thing I think was passed down from my mother.

I'm not lying though. I know everything on the internet has to be taken with a grain of salt, but if I ride my 4 mile commute without the gel pad on top of my saddle, I will get saddle sores. Not after a day, maybe not even a couple days, but in about a week I will have uncomfortable saddle sores.

And I'm no slouch when riding either. I usually put in ~150 miles every week. My butt is perfectly accustomed to road bikes (and mountain bikes when ridden offroad), but when I'm out on the road bike I wear a chamois. When I'm commuting to work, I really don't want to. Plus I'm often on and off the bike throughout the day, so that would involve me changing multiple times per day and that gets really annoying.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 01:21 PM
  #23  
corrado33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdmurphy
+1 to this. I find my backside needs a more rounded saddle top. Brooks Pros, and Ideale 90s fit the bill, and are comfortable from the get go, even when very hard and stiff. I've tried a few Fujita belt saddles, which are closely patterned after the B17. They have a flatter rear section, and a sharper transition from the sides to the top. I dutifully put in a few hundred miles on them, to no avail. Always felt like my sitbones were sitting on a corner of the saddle, rather than supported by it. From looking at the relatively wider width of the Fujita, I think it was extending past the sit bones, and digging into the flesh just past them, with painful results.

If your B17 narrow is painful now, I don't think it's going to get much better. Usually, a good fitting leather saddle will go from good, to great. Not horrible to good or great.

One last point - it seems Brooks changed the width and shape of the Pro some time in the 80s. I like the slightly narrower, more rounded earlier version. Modern production ones seem to flare too much at the back, with a flatter rear profile. They're ok for 20-30 miles, but not much more for me. The older ones fit me like a glove.
Thanks for the advice. With traditional saddles, I HATE rounded/flared back ends. This type of saddle...



I despise. I don't know why, I can't get comfortable on them. My bianchi came with one, so did my panasonic. I tried to ride both of them and I couldn't get comfortable on either. For me, they require almost mm precision on where your butt is forward and backward. If the saddle is too far forward it shoves me into the handlebars. Too far backward and I'm sitting on the "soft bits" between my legs. I move a lot when I ride, I shift my weight around, so having a saddle that requires me to sit in the EXACT same spot every time is... not ideal. I rode one of the curved saddles probably ~150 miles (5ish rides) before I decided to buy myself a flat saddle like the ones I typically ride.

Originally Posted by lostarchitect
Yeah, like I said, tough to diagnose from here. But it's not all about width in terms of the numbers, the shapes of the saddles are different too. If you want to try a thinner one, there are some vintage saddles that are smaller. RHM may have one or two that he has recovered?

As far as adjustment, any direction may make a difference. Some people like leather saddles lower or higher than other saddles. Most (but not all) like the nose tilted a bit up, but the degree varies a lot. You may also find that you want it farther back or forward. This is all generic info, I know, but, again, tough to know what is going on from here.

But all that said, I also think I agree with ThermonicScott: if it's not at least ok at first, it probably isn't for you.
I'll try making it flat. If that doesn't work I'll try moving it around. If that doesn't work, by the end of the month, I'll sell it. Seems like someone above already called it, and I have no reason not to sell it to them.
corrado33 is offline  
Old 08-02-17, 01:23 PM
  #24  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,544
Liked 7,745 Times in 2,875 Posts
I intended no doubts about your problem, and it does sure sound like you need a padded saddle of some sort or padded shorts. Or you might consider padded briefs, which you can wear under work clothes, but you'd still have the problem of needing to change in and out of them throughout the day.
nlerner is online now  
Old 08-02-17, 01:28 PM
  #25  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,806

Bikes: It's complicated.

Liked 6,174 Times in 2,402 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
If you want to try extreme measures, here's what you do. 1, make the saddle wet. How wet, that's debatable. Some people put a wet washcloth over it for a few hours; others dunk it into water for a minute or less, then let it sit for an hour or three. Don't make it sopping wet, just let it soak up some water. Let the water soak in, so it doesn't look wet. This will soften it temporarily. 2, go for a short ride. Just enough that you can see the shape of the saddle starting to change. As soon as you see any change, stop. 3, let it dry. Give it a day or two.
Back in the day it was common to squirt down a new pair of leather cycling shoes with water after you put then on for the first ride. They'd mold to your foot on a hot summer day. Same idea with baseball gloves - some put it in hot water for a few minutes, then put a ball in the pocket, tie it up, and let it dry. Shortens the break in period, but also the life of the glove.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.